Cited by 39Transportation Planning and OptimizationTransportation and Mobility InnovationsUrban Transport and Accessibility

Resistance to change: car use and routines

Open access
Lattarulo, Patrizia, Masucci, Valentino, Pazienza, Maria Grazia·2019·Transport Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.013

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If the behavior is repeated in stable contexts over time, control gradually shifts to automaticity, which is accompanied by an increasing resistance to outcome devaluation.

    “If the behavior is then repeated in stable contexts over time, control gradually shifts to automaticity, which is accompanied by an increasing resistance to outcome devaluation (Neal et al., 2011; Lattarulo et al., 2019).”

    From Context Stability in Habit Building Increases Automaticity and Goal Attainment (2022) · cites this paper as Lattarulo et al., 2019

    The Literature review and research questions section (page unavailable) links repeated commuting choices and stronger habits with more automatic, less deliberative decisions. It also says travel habits can be difficult to influence through increased relative costs. It does not establish a gradual shift in control under stable contexts or increasing resistance to outcome devaluation specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lattarulo, P. (Ed.), 2003. I costi ambientali e sociali della mobilità. Franco Angeli, Milano. Legambiente, 2007. Ecosistema Urbano. Roma.
  2. Parkes, D., Jopson, A., Marsden, G., 2016. Understanding Travel Behaviour Change during Mega-events: Lessons from the London 2012 Games, vol. 92. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, pp. 104-119.
  3. Verplanken, B. and Wood, W. (2006), Interventions to break and create consumer habits, J. Publ. Pol. Market., Vol. 25 (1) Spring 2006, 90-103.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lattarulo, P., Masucci, V., & Pazienza, M. G.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Pazienza, Maria Grazia
Venue
Transport Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
74
Pages
63-72
ISSN
0967-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902547921
Cited by
39
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transport Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
car use, resistance to change, commuter behaviour, transport choice, mode choice, large-scale events, habit formation, Florence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review