Cited by 187Behavioral Health and InterventionsEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Modelling Habit Formation and Its Determinants

Gardner, Benjamin, Lally, Phillippa·2018·The Psychology of Habit

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_12

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardner, B., & Lally, P.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gardner, Benjamin
Venue
The Psychology of Habit
Published
2018
Pages
207-229
OpenAlex
W2887104098
Cited by
187
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
73.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
habit formation, automatism, behavior change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review