Cited by 90Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsPain Management and Opioid Use

Chronic Pain Treatment With Cannabidiol in Kidney Transplant Patients in Uruguay

Cuñetti, L., Manzo, L., Peyraube, R., Arnaiz, J., Curi, L., Orihuela, S.·2018·Transplantation Proceedings

Abstract

Background Chronic pain is a major therapeutic problem in kidney transplant patients owing to nephrotoxicity associated with nonsteroidal antiiflammatory drugs. Benefits in chronic pain treatment with cannabidiol (CBD) have been reported. This study assesses the effect, safety, and possible drug interactions in kidney transplant patients treated with CBD for chronic pain.Methods We assessed patients who asked to receive CBD for pain treatment. Doses were increased from 50 to 150 mg twice a day for 3 weeks. Creatinine, blood count, liver function, liver enzymes, and drug levels were determined every 48 hours the first week and then once a week thereafter.Results We assessed 7 patients with a mean age of 64.5 years (range, 58-75 years). CBD initial dose was 100 mg/d, CBD dose reduction to 50 mg/d has been done on day 4 to patient 1 for persistent nausea. Tacrolimus dose reduction in patient 3 was undertaken on days 4, 7, and 21 owing to persisting elevated levels (even before CBD) and itching, and on day 21 in patient 5. Tacrolimus levels decreased in patient 2 but were normal in the control 1 week later. Patients on cyclosporine were stable. Adverse effects were nausea, dry mouth, dizziness, drowsiness, and intermittent episodes of heat. CBD dose decrease was required in 2 patients. Two patients had total pain improvement, 4 had a partial response in the first 15 days, and in 1 there was no change.Conclusions During this follow-up, CBD was well-tolerated, and there were no severe adverse effects. Plasma levels of tacrolimus were variable. Therefore, longer follow-up is required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.12.042

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuñetti, L., Manzo, L., Peyraube, R., Arnaiz, J., Curi, L., & Orihuela, S.
Affiliations
Hospital Italiano de Montevideo (UY)
Corresponding author
Cuñetti, L.
Venue
Transplantation Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
461-464
ISSN
0041-1345 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790861309
Cited by
90
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transplantation Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
cannabidiol, chronic pain, kidney transplant recipients, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, drug interactions, immunosuppressive therapy, adverse effects, nausea, nephrotoxicity, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tolerability
MeSH terms
Aged, Cannabidiol, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Uruguay, Kidney Transplantation, Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review