Cited by 283Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureTransportation Planning and OptimizationSmart Grid Energy Management

Electric vehicle charging choices: Modelling and implications for smart charging services

Open access
Daina, Nicolò, Sivakumar, Aruna, Polak, John W.·2017·Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Abstract

The rollout of electric vehicles (EV) occurring in parallel with the decarbonisation of the power sector can bring uncontested environmental benefits, in terms of CO 2 emission reduction and air quality. This roll out, however, poses challenges to power systems, as additional power demand is injected in context of increasingly volatile supply from renewable energy sources. Smart EV charging services can provide a solution to such challenges. The development of effective smart charging services requires evaluating pre-emptively EV drivers’ response. The current practice in the appraisal of smart charging strategies largely relies on simplistic or theoretical representation of drivers’ charging and travel behaviour. We propose a random utility model for joint EV drivers’ activity-travel scheduling and charging choices. Our model easily integrates in activity-based demand modelling systems for the analyses of integrated transport and energy systems. However, unlike previous charging behaviour models used in integrated transport and energy system analyses, our model empirically captures the behavioural nuances of tactical charging choices in smart grid context, using empirically estimated charging preferences. We present model estimation results that provide insights into the value placed by individuals on the main attributes of the charging choice and draw implications charging service providers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trc.2017.05.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most approaches proposed in the literature to mitigate voltage imbalance problems are based on smart charging solutions, which require significant investments in infrastructure and strong regulatory frameworks.

    “Most of the approaches proposed in the literature to mitigate such problems are based on smart charging solutions, which require significant investments in infrastructure and strong regulatory frameworks, as pointed out by [21].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daina, N., Sivakumar, A., & Polak, J. W.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Daina, Nicolò
Venue
Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
81
Pages
36-56
ISSN
0968-090X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2618568670
Cited by
283
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Grantham Institute at Imperial College London
  • UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
Keywords
electric vehicle charging, random utility maximization, power system integration, renewable energy variability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review