Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationTraffic control and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamic shared autonomous taxi system considering on-time arrival reliability

Liu, Zhiguang, Miwa, Tomio, Zeng, Weiliang, Bell, Michael G.H., Morikawa, Takayuki·2019·Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2019.04.018
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Dynamic shared autonomous taxi (SAT) systems are regarded as a promising means of improving travel flexibility. With no human drivers, SATs urgently require precise traffic information in order to plan accurate paths independently; in addition, on-time arrival is an essential service quality in SAT systems. In this study, taxis are assumed to be replaced with ride-sharing autonomous vehicles. To improve the probability of on-time arrival, the reliable path concept and collected travel time information are used to facilitate path finding for SATs, and the potential benefits are examined. Two simulation scenarios—one based on historical traffic information and the other based on real-time traffic information—are executed to evaluate the information’s usefulness in reliable path finding. In simulation results, reliable path scenarios showed a higher on-time arrival ratio than shortest path scenarios, in which the shortest path algorithm is used in path finding for SATs, and the historical information-based scenarios showed a higher on-time arrival ratio than the real-time information-based scenarios. A system-beneficial path finding method is proposed and is verified to be effective for mitigating road network congestion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trc.2019.04.018

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lioris, 2016, Dynamic evaluation and optimisation of an urban collective taxis system by discrete-event simulation, World Congr. Intell. Transp. Syst.
  2. Liu, 2018, An agent-based simulation model for shared autonomous taxi system, Asian Transp. Stud., 5, 1

Cited by

See all 48

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Z., Miwa, T., Zeng, W., Bell, M. G. H., & Morikawa, T.
Affiliations
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Institute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability, Nagoya University (JP)
  • Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Institutes of Innovation for Future Society, Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Liu, Zhiguang
ORCID
Venue
Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
103
Pages
281-297
ISSN
0968-090X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.trc.2019.04.018
OpenAlex
W2941854170
Cited by
48
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • JSPS KAKENHI (16H02367, 16K12825)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61803100)
  • China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, ride-sharing, travel time information, real-time traffic information, shortest path, road network congestion, path planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.