Cited by 26Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Study protocol of the intense physical activity and cognition study: the effect of high-intensity exercise training on cognitive function in older adults

Open access
Brown, Belinda M., Rainey‐Smith, Stephanie R., Castalanelli, Natalie, Gordon, Nicole, Markovic, Shaun, Sohrabi, Hamid R., Weinborn, Michael, Laws, Simon M. +4 more·2017·Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Inconsistent results from previous studies of exercise and cognitive function suggest that rigorously designed randomized controlled trials are urgently needed. Here, we describe the design of the Intense Physical Activity and Cognition (IPAC) study, which will assess the impact of a 6-month high-intensity exercise intervention on cognitive function and biomarkers of dementia risk, compared with a 6-month moderate-intensity exercise intervention and control group (no study-related exercise). METHODS: One-hundred and five cognitively healthy men and women aged between 60 and 80 years are randomized into a high-intensity exercise, moderate-intensity exercise, or control group. Individuals randomized to an exercise intervention undertake 6 months of cycle-based exercise twice a week, at 50 minutes per session. All participants undergo comprehensive neuropsychological testing, blood sampling, brain magnetic resonance imaging, fitness testing, and a body composition scan at baseline, 6 months (immediately after intervention), and 18 months (12 months after intervention). DISCUSSION: The IPAC study takes a multidisciplinary approach to investigating the role of exercise in maintaining a healthy brain throughout aging. Rigorous monitoring of exertion and adherence throughout the intervention, combined with repeated measures of fitness, is vital in ensuring an optimum exercise dose is reached. Results from the IPAC study will be used to inform a large-scale multicentre randomized controlled trial, with the ultimate aim of pinpointing the frequency, duration, and intensity of exercise that provides the most benefit to the brain, in terms of enhancing cognitive function and reducing dementia risk in older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trci.2017.09.003

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies indicate that very light-, light-, and moderate-intensity physical activity benefited cognition, but hard-, very hard-, and maximal-intensity physical activity showed no benefit.

    “and other studies indicate that very light-, light-, and moderate-intensity PA benefited cognition, but hard-, very hard-, and maximal-intensity PA demonstrated no benefit (65, 80).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, B. M., Rainey‐Smith, S. R., Castalanelli, N., Gordon, N., Markovic, S., Sohrabi, H. R., Weinborn, M., Laws, S. M., Doecke, J., Shen, K., Martins, R. N., & Peiffer, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Murdoch University (AU)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Brown, Belinda M.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-19
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
562-570
ISSN
2352-8737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766290196
Cited by
26
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council Dementia Research Development Fellowship (GNT1097105)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
high-intensity exercise, moderate-intensity exercise, cognitive function, older adults, dementia risk, exercise intervention, brain aging, exercise adherence, exercise dose, neuropsychological assessment, brain MRI, fitness, body composition, blood biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review