CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 127Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourSocial Acceptance of Renewable Energy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Information perspective for understanding consumers’ perceptions of electric vehicles and adoption intentions

Zhang, Wenliang, Wang, Shanyong, Wan, Liang, Zhang, Zengtian, Zhao, Dingtao·2022·Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103157
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103157

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Bobeth, 2020, Buying an electric car: A rational choice or a norm-directed behavior?, Transport. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., 73, 236, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.009 · DOI
  2. Byun, 2018, Using a discrete choice experiment to predict the penetration possibility of environmentally friendly vehicles, Energy, 144, 312, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.035 · DOI
  3. Chen, 2009, The effects of information overload on consumers’ subjective state towards buying decision in the internet shopping environment, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 8, 48, 10.1016/j.elerap.2008.09.001 · DOI
  4. Coad, 2009, Consumer support for environmental policies: An application to purchases of green cars, Ecol. Econ., 68, 2078, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.015 · DOI
  5. Daziano, 2012, Electric vehicles rising from the dead: Data needs for forecasting consumer response toward sustainable energy sources in personal transportation, Energy Policy, 51, 876, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.040 · DOI
  6. Dumortier, 2015, Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on consumers’ intent to purchase a hybrid or plug-in electric vehicle, Transport. Rese. Part A: Policy Pract., 72, 71
  7. Eder, 2018, Forecasting sustainable development of transport sectors of Russia and EU: Energy consumption and efficiency, Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy, 8, 74
  8. Egbue, 2012, Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions, Energy Policy, 48, 717, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Eppler, 2015, Information quality and information overload: The promises and perils of the information age, Commun. Technol., 5, 215, 10.1515/9783110271355-013 · DOI
  10. Fan, 2015, Buffer effect and price effect of a personal carbon trading scheme, Energy, 82, 601, 10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.069 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, J. Mark. Res., 18, 39, 10.1177/002224378101800104 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Graham-Rowe, 2012, Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations, Transport. Rese. Part A: Policy Pract., 46, 140
  13. Han, 2017, The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values, Transport. Rese. Part A: Policy Pract., 103, 185
  14. He, 2021, Does environmental concern promote EV sales? Duopoly pricing analysis considering consumer heterogeneity, Transport. Res. part D: Transp. Environ., 91, 102695, 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102695 · DOI
  15. Herzog, 1981, Effects of questionnaire length on response quality, Public Opin. Quart., 45, 549, 10.1086/268687 · DOI
  16. Hidrue, 2011, Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes, Resour. Energy Econ., 33, 686, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.02.002 · DOI
  17. Johnson, 2005, Testing and expanding a model of cognitive processing of risk information, Risk Anal.: Int. J., 25, 631, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00609.x · DOI
  18. Junquera, 2016, Analyzing consumer attitudes towards electric vehicle purchasing intentions in Spain: technological limitations and vehicle confidence, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 109, 6, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.006 · DOI
  19. Kim, 2009, The impact of website quality on information quality, value, and loyalty intentions in apparel retailing, J. Interact. Market., 23, 221, 10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.009 · DOI
  20. Kim, 2018, Perceived value and adoption intention for electric vehicles in Korea: Moderating effects of environmental traits and government supports, Energy, 159, 799, 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.064 · DOI
  21. Larson, 2014, Consumer attitudes about electric cars: Pricing analysis and policy implications, Transport. Rese. Part A: Policy Pract., 69, 299
  22. Li, 2016, Consumers’ evaluation of national new energy vehicle policy in China: An analysis based on a four paradigm model, Energy Policy, 99, 33, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.050 · DOI
  23. Li, 2017, Household factors and adopting intention of battery electric vehicles: a multi-group structural equation model analysis among consumers in Jiangsu Province, China. Natural Hazards, 87, 945, 10.1007/s11069-017-2803-9 · DOI
  24. Li, 2018, Effects of personal carbon trading on the decision to adopt battery electric vehicles: Analysis based on a choice experiment in Jiangsu, China, Appl. Energy, 209, 478, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.119 · DOI
  25. Linton, 2015, Approaches and techniques for modeling CO2 emissions from road transport, Transport Reviews, 35, 533, 10.1080/01441647.2015.1030004 · DOI
  26. Morganti, 2018, Technical and operational obstacles to the adoption of electric vans in France and the UK: An operator perspective, Transp. Policy, 63, 90, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.12.010 · DOI
  27. Ng, 2018, Predicting purchase intention of electric vehicles in Hong Kong, Australasian Market. J. (AMJ), 26, 272, 10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.05.015 · DOI
  28. Bonsón Ponte, 2015, Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: Integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents, Tour. Manage., 47, 286, 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Raimi, 2014, Belief superiority in the environmental domain: Attitude extremity and reactions to fracking, J. Environ. Psychol., 40, 76, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.05.005 · DOI
  30. Rezvani, 2015, Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda, Transport. Res. part D: Transp. Environ., 34, 122, 10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Ru, 2019, Young people’s behaviour intentions towards reducing PM2. 5 in China: Extending the theory of planned behavior, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 141, 99, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.019 · DOI
  32. Schuitema, 2013, The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles, Transport. Rese. Part A: Policy Pract., 48, 39
  33. Shi, 2017, Exploring urban resident’s vehicular PM2.5 reduction behavior intention: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior, J. Cleaner Prod., 147, 603, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.108 · DOI
  34. Sicilia, 2010, The effects of the amount of information on cognitive responses in online purchasing tasks, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 9, 183, 10.1016/j.elerap.2009.03.004 · DOI
  35. Sierzchula, 2014, The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption, Energy Policy, 68, 183, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043 · DOI
  36. Simsekoglu, 2019, Predictors of intention to buy a battery electric vehicle among conventional car drivers, Transport. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., 60, 1, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.10.001 · DOI
  37. Sun, 2020, Understanding consumers’ intentions to purchase green products in the social media marketing context, Asia Pacific J. Market. Logist., 32, 860, 10.1108/APJML-03-2019-0178 · DOI
  38. Valdez, 2019, The imagined electric vehicle user: Insights from pioneering and prospective buyers in Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, Transport. Res. part D: Transp. Environ., 71, 85, 10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.010 · DOI
  39. Wang, 2015, The impact of government subsidies or penalties for new-energy vehicles a static and evolutionary game model analysis, J. Transp. Econ. Policy (JTEP), 49, 98, 10.3828/jtep.2015.49.1.98 · DOI
  40. Wang, 2016, Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model, Transportation, 43, 123, 10.1007/s11116-014-9567-9 · DOI
  41. Wang, 2017, The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: Evidence from China, Transport. Rese. Part A: Policy Pract., 105, 14
  42. Wang, 2018, Green information, green certification and consumer perceptions of remanufactured automobile parts, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 128, 187, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.015 · DOI
  43. Wang, 2018, Policy implications for promoting the adoption of electric vehicles: Do consumer’s knowledge, perceived risk and financial incentive policy matter?, Transport. Rese. Part A: Policy Pract., 117, 58, 10.1016/j.trc.2017.12.003 · DOI
  44. Wang, 2019, Purchasing intentions of Chinese consumers on energy-efficient appliances: Is the energy efficiency label effective?, J. Cleaner Prod., 238, 117896, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117896 · DOI
  45. Wang, 2019, Information publicity and resident’s waste separation behavior: An empirical study based on the norm activation model, Waste Manage., 87, 33, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.038 · DOI
  46. Wang, 2020, An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model, Transportation, 47, 397, 10.1007/s11116-018-9893-4 · DOI
  47. White, 2017, You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions, Transport. Rese. Part A: Policy Pract., 99, 94
  48. Xu, 2020, Moving towards sustainable purchase behavior: examining the determinants of consumers’ intentions to adopt electric vehicles, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 27, 22535, 10.1007/s11356-020-08835-9 · DOI
  49. Xu, 2021, Transition to sustainable transport: understanding the antecedents of consumer’s intention to adopt electric vehicles from the emotional research perspective, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28, 20362, 10.1007/s11356-020-12006-1 · DOI
  50. Zeithaml, 1988, Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence, J. Market., 52, 2, 10.1177/002224298805200302 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Zhang, 2018, Is subsidized electric vehicles adoption sustainable: Consumers’ perceptions and motivation toward incentive policies, environmental benefits, and risks, J. Cleaner Prod., 192, 71, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.252 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, W., Wang, S., Wan, L., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, D.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Shanyong
ORCID
Venue
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
102
Pages
103157
ISSN
1361-9209 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.trd.2021.103157
OpenAlex
W4200272837
Cited by
127
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Science and Technology of China (YD2160002002)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71974177, 71601174)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Keywords
electric vehicles, consumer perception, adoption intention, perceived value, perceived trust, information quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review