The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linking aboveground and belowground diversity
Open accessAbstract
Aboveground and belowground species interactions drive ecosystem properties at the local scale, but it is unclear how these relationships scale-up to regional and global scales. Here, we discuss our current knowledge of aboveground and belowground diversity links from a global to a local scale. Global diversity peaks towards the Equator for large, aboveground organisms, but not for small (mainly belowground) organisms, suggesting that there are size-related biodiversity gradients in global aboveground–belowground linkages. The generalization of aboveground–belowground diversity relationships, and their role in ecosystem functioning, requires surveys at scales that are relevant to the organisms and ecosystem properties. Habitat sizes and diversity gradients can differ significantly between aboveground and belowground organisms and between ecosystems. These gradients in biodiversity and plant community trait perception need to be acknowledged when studying aboveground–belowground biodiversity linkages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological Linkages Between Aboveground and Belowground Biota
Wardle, D. A., Bardgett, R. D., Klironomos, J. N., Setälä, H., van der Putten, W. H., & Wall, D. H. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094875 · Cited by 4,617
Self-citationMycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity
van der Heijden, M. G. A., Klironomos, J. N., Ursic, M., Moutoglis, P., Streitwolf-Engel, R., Boller, T., Wiemken, A., & Sanders, I. R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23932 · Cited by 3,553
Lavorel, S., & Garnier, E. (2002) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x · Cited by 3,452
ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD-SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS
Hawkins, B. A., Field, R., Cornell, H. V., Currie, D. J., Guégan, J.-F., Kaufman, D. M., Kerr, J. T., Mittelbach, G. G., Oberdorff, T., O'Brien, E. M., et al. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-8006 · Cited by 2,451
Latitudinal Gradients of Biodiversity: Pattern, Process, Scale, and Synthesis
Willig, M. R., Kaufman, D. M., & Stevens, R. D. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.012103.144032 · Cited by 2,163
On the Generality of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient
Hillebrand, H. (2004) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/381004 · Cited by 2,085
Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum*
JOHNSON, N. C., GRAHAM, J., & SMITH, F. A. (1997) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00729.x · Cited by 2,020
Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness
Wiens, J. J., & Donoghue, M. J. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.011 · Cited by 1,962
Global Dispersal of Free-Living Microbial Eukaryote Species
Finlay, B. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070710 · Cited by 1,825
WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY?
Mittelbach, G. G., Steiner, C. F., Scheiner, S. M., Gross, K. L., Reynolds, H. L., Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Dodson, S. I., & Gough, L. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2381:witorb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,650
Cited by
Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes ‐ eight hypotheses
Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J. M., Rand, T. A., Didham, R. K., Fahrig, L., Batáry, P., Bengtsson, J., Clough, Y., Crist, T. O., Dormann, C. F., et al. (2012) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00216.x · Cited by 2,134
Self-citationEcological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security
Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D., & Potts, S. G. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012 · Cited by 1,862
Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services
Lavelle, P., Decaëns, T., Aubert, M., Barot, S., Blouin, M., Bureau, F., Margerie, P., Mora, P., & Rossi, J.-P. (2006) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.10.002 · Cited by 1,606
Gessner, M. O., Swan, C. M., Dang, C. K., McKie, B. G., Bardgett, R. D., Wall, D. H., & Hättenschwiler, S. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.010 · Cited by 1,335
Land-use intensification causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland communities
Gossner, M. M., Lewinsohn, T. M., Kahl, T., Grassein, F., Boch, S., Prati, D., Birkhofer, K., Renner, S. C., Sikorski, J., Wubet, T., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20575 · Cited by 706
Metadata
- Authors
- DEDEYN, G., & VANDERPUTTEN, W.
- Venue
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 625-633
- ISSN
- 0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137351174
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking aboveground and belowground diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.009
- The paper
- DEDEYN, G., & VANDERPUTTEN, W. (2005). Linking aboveground and belowground diversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
