Cited by 207Physiological and biochemical adaptationsAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Allometry of behavior

Dial, Kenneth P., Greene, Erick, Irschick, Duncan J.·2008·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

The study of allometric and size scaling relationships is well developed in most biological fields, but lags behind in the area of animal behavior. Part of the reason for this deficit is that scaling relationships of behaviors tend to be inherently more 'noisy' than other biological scaling relationships. However, body size has a pervasive influence on the performance of animals in their environments. For example, the frequently strong relationship between power-to-mass ratios and locomotor performance means that smaller species and individuals enjoy superior locomotor performance (burst acceleration and maneuverability) than larger species, particularly within a clade. We suggest that these size-related functional influences on performance profoundly influence many aspects of animal behavior, such as how animals forage, fight, flee, perceive danger, respond to risk and interact with other individuals. We outline exciting avenues for research on the allometry of behavior by integrating scaling and functional perspectives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dial, K. P., Greene, E., & Irschick, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Montana (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Dial, Kenneth P.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
394-401
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061126383
Cited by
207
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
body size scaling, locomotor performance, specific power, foraging behavior, fighting behavior, predator avoidance, risk response, animal behavior, functional morphology
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Biometry, Body Weight, Ecology, Biological Evolution, Locomotion, Models, Biological, Risk Factors, Species Specificity, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review