Cited by 295Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

Bateman's principles and human sex roles

Open access
Brown, Gillian R., Laland, Kevin N., Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff·2009·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

In 1948, Angus J. Bateman reported a stronger relationship between mating and reproductive success in male fruit flies compared with females, and concluded that selection should universally favour 'an undiscriminating eagerness in the males and a discriminating passivity in the females' to obtain mates. The conventional view of promiscuous, undiscriminating males and coy, choosy females has also been applied to our own species. Here, we challenge the view that evolutionary theory prescribes stereotyped sex roles in human beings, firstly by reviewing Bateman's principles and recent sexual selection theory and, secondly, by examining data on mating behaviour and reproductive success in current and historic human populations. We argue that human mating strategies are unlikely to conform to a single universal pattern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.005

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Men's reproductive success is more variable than women's, especially in societies with polygyny or serial monogamy.

    “The reproductive success of men is more variable than that of women, especially in societies characterized by polygyny or serial monogamy”

    From The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2011) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [30]Murdock G.P. Ethnographic Atlas 1967 University of Pittsburgh Press
  2. [46]Beckerman S. Valentine P. Cultures of Multiple Fathers 2002 University Press of Florida
  3. [91]Borgerhoff Mulder M. Reproductive success in three Kipsigis cohorts Clutton-Brock T.H. Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems 1988 University of Chicago Press 419 435

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N., & Mulder, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Gillian R.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
297-304
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083230307
Cited by
295
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2013-10-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
Bateman's principle, sexual selection, mating success, reproductive success, human mating strategies, female mate choice, fruit flies
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Reproduction, Selection, Genetic, Sex Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review