Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A framework for implementing critical thinking as a language pedagogy in EFL preparatory programmes

Alnofaie, Haifa·2013·Thinking Skills and Creativity

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.09.002

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 48

Metadata

Authors
Alnofaie, H.
Venue
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
10
Pages
154-158
ISSN
1871-1871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039375264
Cited by
48
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Thinking Skills and Creativity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
critical thinking, English as a foreign language, language teaching, implementation framework, postsecondary education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A framework for implementing critical thinking as a language pedagogy in EFL preparatory programmes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.09.002
The paper
Alnofaie, H. (2013). A framework for implementing critical thinking as a language pedagogy in EFL preparatory programmes. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.09.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.