The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Dynamic Metacognitive Systems Account of Chinese University Students' Knowledge About EFL Reading
Abstract
Metacognition, conceptualized as a set of dynamic systems, has been recognized as an important area of academic and pedagogical inquiry in applied linguistics from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Nonetheless, literature on students' metacognition about EFL reading is still cursory, and that is particularly true as regards Chinese EFL students. In response to globalization, many students whose first language is Chinese have become transnationals and are pursuing academic studies in English. The current study focuses on these second language (L2) learners. By reporting findings from an interview study of 20 Chinese students' EFL reading experiences framed within a dynamic metacognitive systems perspective, it attempts to account for the learner behavior and thinking that are normally reported under the rubric of language learning strategy research, which has courted criticism recently. The results suggest that there is a strong relationship between metacognition and successful EFL reading comprehension, and that the successful and the less successful L2 students are different in the amount and the quality of the metacognitive knowledge they possess. These results are discussed for possible insights into research on such learners and the pedagogical practices of teachers working with them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282
Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 · Cited by 10,197
The Psychology of the Language Learner
Dörnyei, Z. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781410613349 · Cited by 700
Strategies for Language Learning and for Language Use: Revising the Theoretical Framework
MACARO, E. (2006) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00425.x · Cited by 488
Cited by
L2 Reading Comprehension and Its Correlates: A Meta‐Analysis
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12034 · Cited by 484
A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies
TENG, L. S., & ZHANG, L. J. (2016) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12339 · Cited by 345
Self-citationOng, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2010) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.003 · Cited by 281
Self-citationWang, C., & Bai, B. (2017) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.355 · Cited by 138
Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5 · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ZHANG, L. J.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 320-353
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7249
- OpenAlex
- W1982532194
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 65.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Dynamic Metacognitive Systems Account of Chinese University Students' Knowledge About EFL Reading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5054/tq.2010.223352
- The paper
- ZHANG, L. J. (2010). A Dynamic Metacognitive Systems Account of Chinese University Students' Knowledge About EFL Reading. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.223352
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.