Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Creativity is not merely artistic ability but also the ability to solve problems in new and unique ways.
“Creativity is not merely artistic ability but also the ability to solve problems in new and unique ways (Henriksen et al., 2017;Muzaini et al., 2021).”
From Show and Tell Learning Method Based on the Discovery Learning Model: Creativity and Learning Outcomes at Primary School (2025) · cites this paper as Henriksen et al., 2017
Integrating DT into STEM education enhances creativity, problem-solving abilities, and student engagement.
“Integrating DT into STEM education enhances creativity, problem-solving abilities, and student engagement by offering a flexible framework that supports both technical skill development and innovative thinking (Henriksen et al., 2017;Johansson-Sköldberg et al., 2013).”
From A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education (2026) · cites this paper as Henriksen et al., 2017
DT plays a crucial role in modernizing STEM curricula and helping to inspire more female students to pursue STEM careers.
“Additionally, DT plays a crucial role in modernizing STEM curricula, helping to inspire more female students to pursue STEM careers, particularly in gendered societies where female representation is lower (Henriksen et al., 2017;Kijima & Sun, 2020).”
From A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education (2026) · cites this paper as Henriksen et al., 2017
Cites
Phenomenological research methods
Moustakas, C. (1994) · doi:10.4135/9781412995658 · Cited by 13,919 · see citing works
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604 · see citing works
Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning?
Kirschner, P. A. (2015) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9346-9 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muneer, S., Santhosh, M., Parangusan, H., & Bhadra, J. (2026) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-025-10005-2 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Nur, Z., Mulyadi, M., & Nurdiansyah, E. (2025) · ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review · doi:10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4350 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Henriksen, Danah
- Venue
- Thinking Skills and Creativity
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 140-153
- ISSN
- 1871-1871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2762286072
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Thinking Skills and Creativity (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- design thinking, teacher creativity, teacher professional development, habits of mind, creative problem solving, 21st century skills, classroom climate, intellectual risk-taking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review