Cited by 22Problem Solving Skills DevelopmentEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentYouth Development and Social Support

A study examining the effects of a training program focused on problem-solving skills for young adults

Lee, Bora, Lee, Yoonhee·2020·Thinking Skills and Creativity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100692

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lee, B., & Lee, Y.
Affiliations
Korea University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Bora
Venue
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
37
Pages
100692
ISSN
1871-1871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044235220
Cited by
22
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Thinking Skills and Creativity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
problem-solving skills, out-of-school time programs, youth development, young adults, 21st century skills, training program effectiveness, multi-source assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review