Cited by 17Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionWorkaholism, burnout, and well-being

Exploring the interplay between well-being, mindfulness, creativity, and work engagement among EFL teachers

Zhi, Ran, Wang, Yongxiang·2025·Thinking Skills and Creativity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101697

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhi, R., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
  • Nanjing Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yongxiang
Venue
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-06
Volume
56
Pages
101697
ISSN
1871-1871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405018340
Cited by
15
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Thinking Skills and Creativity (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Nanjing Normal University
  • National Social Science Fund of China (22BYY023)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
Keywords
work engagement, teacher well-being, mindfulness, teacher creativity, EFL teachers, English as a foreign language, teacher emotional well-being, teacher engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review