Cited by 27Vector-borne infectious diseasesStudy of Mite SpeciesViral Infections and Vectors

Distribution of ticks in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Open access
Omeragić, Jasmin, Šerić – Haračić, Sabina, Klarić Soldo, Darinka, Kapo, Naida, Fejzić, Nihad, Škapur, Vedad, Medlock, Jolyon·2022·Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases

Abstract

Ticks are one of the important groups of parasites, whose populations have increased in Europe in the last 20 years and, as vectors of many emerging diseases, are a major threat to human and animal health. Bosnia and Herzegovina has both climate and environmental conditions favorable for ticks. Given this risk, the aim of this study was to identify tick species currently present in this country and to compare the findings with previous studies, in order to update information on their spatial distribution and other parameters of occurrence. From March 2017 to April 2020, ticks were collected in 42 sampling areas (municipalities) throughout the country. Prespecified identification keys were used for identifying the ticks to the species level. A total of 6193 tick specimens from the Ixodidae family were collected from animal hosts or from vegetation. Ixodes ricinus was the most dominant tick species found. However, our results indicate a decrease in the relative contribution of this tick species to the overall abundance of tick populations. Dermacentor marginatus, which almost doubled in abundance compared to earlier studies, is the second most common tick species. We further confirmed the presence of Dermacentor reticulatus, Rhipicephalus bursa, Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato, Hyalomma marginatum and Haemaphysalis punctata. Ixodes hexagonus, Ixodes canisuga and Haemaphysalis concinna, which were previously reported at low abundance were not found amongst our specimens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101870

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Romania, reported canine heartworm prevalence has been increasing in correlation with increased interest and publications, with average prevalences of 3.3 and 6.15% reported by Mircean et al. and Ionică et al., respectively.

    “In Romania, reported prevalence has been increasing in correlation with increased interest and publications on canine heartworm. Mircean et al. [74] and Ionică et al. [75] reported average prevalence of 3.3 and 6.15%, respectively.”
  • Romania and Bulgaria are endemic countries, showing increased prevalence in the last decade.

    “Romania and Bulgaria are endemic countries as well, showing increased prevalence in the last decade.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Kadriaj P. Velo E. Bino S. Entomological study of ticks in Albania during 2010–2015 Int. J. Sci. Res. 7 2018 10.21275/ART20179756 · DOI
  2. Muftic I.R. Ixodida Fauna in Cattle and Sheep in Northwestern Bosnia. (Geographical Location and Seasonal Dynamics of Some Species) 1965 Veterinary Faculty of Sarajevo, University of Sarajevo, BiH PhD thesis
  3. Omeragic J. Investigation of Ticks of the Ixodidae Family in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2008 Veterinary Faculty University of Sarajevo, BiH PhD thesis
  4. Omeragić J. Zuko A. Jažić A. The effect of various factors for the development of ticks and ticks borne diseases in Bosnia and Herzegovina Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Neglected Vectors and Vector-Borne Diseases (EURNEGVEC) With Management Committee and Working Gropu Meetings of the Cost Action TD1303 Abstract book, Izmir, Turkey 2015
  5. Zuko A. Parasites and Parasitoses in Ruminants in Upland Regions of Bosnia and Herzegovina 1998 University of Sarajevo Veterinary faculty Sarajevo, BiH PhD Thesis

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Omeragić, J., Šerić – Haračić, S., Klarić Soldo, D., Kapo, N., Fejzić, N., Škapur, V., & Medlock, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Sarajevo (BA)
  • Public Health England (GB)
Venue
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
101870
ISSN
1877-959X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3212732488
Cited by
27
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
  • European Food Safety Authority
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Study of Mite Species
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
Keywords
tick species distribution, Ixodidae, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ixodes ricinus, Dermacentor marginatus, Dermacentor reticulatus, Rhipicephalus bursa, Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato, Hyalomma marginatum, Haemaphysalis punctata, Haemaphysalis concinna, Ixodes hexagonus, Ixodes canisuga, tick vectors
MeSH terms
Animals, Europe, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ixodes, Ixodidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review