The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007) · doi:10.5194/hessd-4-439-2007 · Cited by 13,640
Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification
(2007) · doi:10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007 · Cited by 13,640
World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006) · Meteorologische Zeitschrift · doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 · Cited by 11,456
World Urbanization Prospects: The 1996 Revision
Brockerhoff, M., & Nations, U. (1998) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2808041 · Cited by 5,881
de Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00089-7 · Cited by 4,809
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 · Cited by 3,464
Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 · Cited by 3,158
Ecosystem services in urban areas
Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00013-0 · Cited by 2,942
Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4645 · Cited by 2,846
What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 · Cited by 2,143
Cited by
Haaland, C., & van den Bosch, C. K. (2015) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009 · Cited by 1,585
Nature Contact and Human Health: A Research Agenda
Frumkin, H., Bratman, G. N., Breslow, S. J., Cochran, B., Kahn Jr, P. H., Lawler, J. J., Levin, P. S., Tandon, P. S., Varanasi, U., Wolf, K. L., et al. (2017) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp1663 · Cited by 1,237
“Both civil society (Harnik and Welle 2009; NRPA 2015) and academic researchers (Naidoo et al. 2006; Roy et al. 2012; Shoup 2010) characterize the ecosystem services provided by parks and greenspace, tree canopy, open land, and other natural assets.”
BackgroundRousell, D., & Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. (2020) · Children's Geographies · doi:10.1080/14733285.2019.1614532 · Cited by 621
Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature
Keeler, B. L., Hamel, P., McPhearson, T., Hamann, M. H., Donahue, M. L., Meza Prado, K. A., Arkema, K. K., Bratman, G. N., Brauman, K. A., Finlay, J. C., et al. (2019) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1 · Cited by 530
Escobedo, F. J., Giannico, V., Jim, C. Y., Sanesi, G., & Lafortezza, R. (2019) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, S., Byrne, J., & Pickering, C.
- Venue
- Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 351-363
- ISSN
- 1610-8167 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-8667
- OpenAlex
- W2030516572
- Cited by
- 1,049
- References
- 118
- FWCI
- 67.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006
- The paper
- Roy, S., Byrne, J., & Pickering, C. (2012). A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
