Cited by 143Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementSkin Diseases and DiabetesUltrasound Imaging and Elastography

Epidermal Thickness and Biomechanical Properties of Plantar Tissues in Diabetic Foot

Chao, Clare Y.L., Zheng, Yong-Ping, Cheing, Gladys L.Y.·2011·Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Abstract

Diabetic foot is a common complication for people with diabetes but it is unclear whether the change is initiated from the skin surface or underneath plantar tissues. This study compared the thickness of epidermis and the thickness and stiffness of the total plantar soft tissue among people with diabetes with or without complications. Seventy-two people with diabetes, including 22 people with neuropathies, 16 foot ulcerations, 34 pure diabetics without complications and 40 healthy controls participated in the study. The thickness of the epidermal layer of the plantar skin was examined using high-frequency ultrasonography; the thickness and stiffness of the total plantar soft tissue were measured by using tissue ultrasound palpation system at the big toe, the first, third and fifth metatarsal heads; and the heel pad. Compared with the control group, the average epidermal thickness of plantar skin was reduced by 15% in people with diabetic foot ulceration and 9% in people with neuropathy, but was increased by 6% in pure diabetics. There was an 8% increase in total thickness of plantar soft tissue in the 3 diabetic groups at all testing sites (all p < 0.05), except the first metatarsal head. The stiffness of plantar soft tissue was increased in all diabetic groups at all testing sites compared with the control (all p < 0.05). The epidermal plantar skin becomes thinner and plantar soft tissues stiffen in people with diabetes, particularly in persons who have neuropathy or ulceration, which increases the risk of tissue breakdown and ulceration formation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.04.004

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chao, C. Y. L., Zheng, Y.-P., & Cheing, G. L. Y.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Cheing, Gladys L.Y.
Venue
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
37
Issue
7
Pages
1029-1038
ISSN
0301-5629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005413679
Cited by
143
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Keywords
diabetic foot, epidermal thickness, plantar soft tissue, tissue stiffness, diabetic neuropathy, foot ulcer, high-frequency ultrasound, heel pad, metatarsal heads, skin biomechanics
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Software, Ultrasonography, User-Computer Interface, Case-Control Studies, Diabetic Foot

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review