The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm - An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement
Abstract
Websites opposing vaccination are prevalent on the Internet. Web 2.0, defined by interaction and user-generated content, has become ubiquitous. Furthermore, a new postmodern paradigm of healthcare has emerged, where power has shifted from doctors to patients, the legitimacy of science is questioned, and expertise is redefined. Together this has created an environment where anti-vaccine activists are able to effectively spread their messages. Evidence shows that individuals turn to the Internet for vaccination advice, and suggests such sources can impact vaccination decisions - therefore it is likely that anti-vaccine websites can influence whether people vaccinate themselves or their children. This overview examines the types of rhetoric individuals may encounter online in order to better understand why the anti-vaccination movement can be convincing, despite lacking scientific support for their claims. Tactics and tropes commonly used to argue against vaccination are described. This includes actions such as skewing science, shifting hypotheses, censoring dissent, and attacking critics; also discussed are frequently made claims such as not being "anti-vaccine" but "pro-safe vaccines", that vaccines are toxic or unnatural, and more. Recognizing disingenuous claims made by the anti-vaccination movement is essential in order to critically evaluate the information and misinformation encountered online.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Parents who go to the Internet will find that some of the top “hits” for vaccine-related search terms are websites that propagate anti-vaccine conspiracy theories [14], [15].”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Such attempts at intervention may therefore fail on people who are sympathetic to a variety of conspiracy claims [14], [15].”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Wakefield, A., Murch, S., Anthony, A., Linnell, J., Casson, D., Malik, M., Berelowitz, M., Dhillon, A., Thomson, M., Harvey, P., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11096-0 · Cited by 3,006
RetractedA postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet
Kata, A. (2010) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022 · Cited by 1,208
Self-citationAutism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association
Taylor, B., Miller, E., Farrington, C., Petropoulos, M.-C., Favot-Mayaud, I., Li, J., & Waight, P. A. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01239-8 · Cited by 753
Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story
Gangarosa, E., Gałazka, A., Wolfe, C., Phillips, L., Miller, E., Chen, R., & Gangarosa, R. E. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04334-1 · Cited by 749
YouTube as a Source of Information on Immunization: A Content Analysis
Keelan, J. E., Pavri-Garcia, V., TOMLINSON, G. A., & Wilson, K. R. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.21.2482 · Cited by 593
Factors Associated With Refusal of Childhood Vaccines Among Parents of School-aged Children
Salmon, D. A., Moulton, L. H., Omer, S. B., deHart, M. P., Stokley, S. K., & Halsey, N. A. (2005) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.159.5.470 · Cited by 514
Anti-vaccinationists past and present
Wolfe, R. M., & Sharp, L. K. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7361.430 · Cited by 505
Parental vaccine safety concerns in 2009
Freed, G. L., Clark, S. J., Butchart, A. T., Singer, D. C., & Davis, M. M. (2010) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1962 · Cited by 503
The Influence of Vaccine-critical Websites on Perceiving Vaccination Risks
Betsch, C., Renkewitz, F., Betsch, T., & Ulshöfer, C. (2010) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105309353647 · Cited by 493
Hate Online: A Content Analysis of Extremist Internet Sites
Gerstenfeld, P. B., Grant, D. R., & Chiang, C. (2003) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00013.x · Cited by 445
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999, Achievements in public health, 1900–1999 impact of vaccines universally recommended for children – United States, 1990–1998, Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 48, 243
- Friedlander, 2001, Opposition to immunization: a pattern of deception, Sci Rev Altern Med, 5, 18
- Betsch, 2009, Langfristige Auswirkungen einer Informationssuche auf impfkritischen Internetseiten, Prävention, 32, 125
- Loe Fisher B. In the wake of vaccines. Mothering 2004; vol. 126 (September–October). http://www.trinitychiro.com/media/Mothering_Vaccine_Article.pdf. [Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5ydNaolTD].
- Sears RW. Is aluminum the new thimerosal? Mothering 2008; vol. 146 (January–February). http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sears.html. [Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5ydMwOrop].
- Age of Autism. Columbia University Press and Dr. Paul Offit Sued for Autism's False Prophets, http://www.ageofautism.com/2009/02/columbia-university-press-and-dr-paul-offit-sued-for-autisms-false-prophets.html; 2009 [accessed 20.04.11]. [Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5y5ucrMvQ].
- Wimer B, Emm JL, Bader D. Chickenpox party: developing natural varicella immunity. Mothering 2004; vol. 122 (January–February). http://www.whale.to/vaccine/wimer.html. [Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5ydfISM5W].
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,000
Ye, J., Hai, J., Wang, Z., Wei, C., & Song, J. (2023) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad023 · Cited by 34
Non-medical use of prescription drugs among illicit drug users: A case study on an online drug forum
Rönkä, S., & Katainen, A. (2016) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.08.013 · Cited by 32
Bar‐Lev, S., Reichman, S., & Barnett‐Itzhaki, Z. (2021) · Israel Journal of Health Policy Research · doi:10.1186/s13584-021-00486-6 · Cited by 31
“People also tend to trust nontraditional sources of information more than official sources [13, 14].”
BackgroundThe Social Lives of Infectious Diseases: Why Culture Matters to COVID-19
Bayeh, R., Yampolsky, M. A., & Ryder, A. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648086 · Cited by 36
“Unsurprisingly, evidence shows that individuals search for medical advice on the internet and consider pseudoscientific claims as equally valid as evidence-based opinions (Kata, 2012).”
BackgroundHerasimenka, A., Au, Y., George, A., Joynes-Burgess, K., Knuutila, A., Bright, J., & Howard, P. N. (2022) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqac043 · Cited by 36
“Some anti-vaccination groups are part of a broader phenomenon of conspiracy-driven movements that draw on a similar resource-gathering playbook, which includes harnessing platforms to spread their message at scale (Kata, 2012).”
BackgroundFactors associated with poor adherence to MMR vaccination in parents who follow vaccination schedule
Restivo, V., Napoli, G., Marsala, M. G. L., Bonanno, V., Sciuto, V., Amodio, E., Calamusa, G., Vitale, F. M., & Firenze, A. (2014) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.4161/hv.34416 · Cited by 31
Injecting fun? Humour, conspiracy theory and (anti)vaccination discourse in popular media
Fiadotava, A., Сергеевна, А. А., Hendershott, R., McKinnon, M., & Jürgens, A. (2023) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625221147019 · Cited by 30
“While the impact of Internet memes remains unclear, it is clear that anti-vaccination media messaging influences people’s vaccination decisions (Kata, 2012), so it is reasonable to predict that humorous Internet memes might also effectively spread messages that shape opinions on the necessity of…”
BackgroundTo Debunk or Not to Debunk? Correcting (Mis)Information
Vraga, E. K., Ecker, U. K. H., Žeželj, I. L., Lazić, A., & Azlan, A. A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4_7 · Cited by 30
Meyer, S. B., Lu, S. K., Hoffman‐Goetz, L., Smale, B. J. A., MacDougall, H. A., & Pearce, A. R. (2016) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1222038 · Cited by 30
“Jenny McCarthy’s claims presented in the newspapers reviewed were spread worldwide, contributing to a wave of antivaccine sentiment (Kata, 2012).”
BackgroundErgoic framing in New Right online groups
Procházka, O., & Blommaert, J. (2020) · Australian Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/aral.19033.pro · Cited by 30
Investigation of perceived fear of COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy in nursing students
Yeşi̇ltepe, A., Aslan, S., & Bülbüloğlu, S. (2021) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.2000817 · Cited by 31
The social (media) side to rheumatology
Berenbaum, F. (2014) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2014.20 · Cited by 29
Rozbroj, T., Lyons, A., & Lucke, J. C. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.08.023 · Cited by 30
Gesser‐Edelsburg, A., Walter, N., & Shir-Raz, Y. (2016) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1110224 · Cited by 29
“Nevertheless, in the context of the antivaccine movement, Kata (2012) has demonstrated the centrality of this virtual space for promoting misinformation about vaccines.”
BackgroundGuljaš, S., Bosnić, Z., Salha, T., Berecki, M., Dupan, Z. K., Rudan, S., & Majnarić, L. T. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18116141 · Cited by 30
Unvaxxed: A Cultural Study of the Online Anti-Vaccination Movement
DiRusso, C., & Stansberry, K. (2021) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323211056050 · Cited by 29
Public Perception of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinations on Social Media: Questionnaire and Sentiment Analysis
Roe, C., Lowe, M., Williams, B., & Miller, C. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182413028 · Cited by 29
“Since their introduction, vaccinations have revolutionised health care whilst at the same time persistently facing opposition [4,5] from hesitant individuals who perceive them as unnecessary or dangerous [6].”
BackgroundRughiniş, C., & Flaherty, M. G. (2022) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2022.782851 · Cited by 29
“This conceptual template challenges a blanket invocation of postmodernism to explain such controversies (Brown, 1990; Smith, 1996; Flaherty et al., 2002; Kata, 2012; Bricker and Justice, 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialPrada‐García, C., Espinilla, V. F., Hernán-García, C., Sanz-Muñoz, I., Martínez-Olmos, J., Bouza, J. M. E., & Castrodeza-Sanz, J. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191711139 · Cited by 29
“Many people search online for health information, and the information found impacts patient decision-making [38].”
BackgroundThe effect of competition between health opinions on epidemic dynamics
Teslya, A., Nunner, H., Buskens, V., & Kretzschmar, M. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac260 · Cited by 31
Performance-based measurement of ehealth literacy: systematic scoping review
Crocker, B., Feng, O., & Duncan, L. R. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/44602 · Cited by 28
“Many avid followers of the antivaccine movement have spent several hours surfing the internet for health-related information [15,16].”
A critical evaluation of science outreach via social media: its role and impact on scientists
McClain, C. R., & Neeley, L. (2015) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.5918.2 · Cited by 28
Lee, C. H. J., Overall, N. C., & Sibley, C. G. (2020) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.020 · Cited by 28
Atkinson, K. M., Mithani, S. S., Bell, C., Rubens-Augustson, T., & Wilson, K. R. (2020) · Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy · doi:10.1177/2515135520967203 · Cited by 28
Can News Literacy Help Reduce Belief in COVID Misinformation?
Ashley, S., Craft, S., Maksl, A., Tully, M., & Vraga, E. K. (2022) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2022.2137040 · Cited by 28
“These conspiracy theories are not limited to explicitly political matters—for example, conspiratorial thinking regarding the dangerous role of “Big Pharma” and governments are common to vaccine misinformation (Kata, 2012) and now to COVID-19 (Grimes & Serra, 2021).”
BackgroundDevelopment and release of a national immunization app for Canada (ImmunizeCA)
Wilson, K. R., Atkinson, K. M., & Penney, G. (2015) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.02.022 · Cited by 28
Velan, B., & Yadgar, Y. (2017) · Israel Journal of Health Policy Research · doi:10.1186/s13584-017-0153-4 · Cited by 28
Questioning science with science: The evolution of the vaccine safety movement
Koltai, K., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2017) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401026 · Cited by 28
“Although the claim of a link between vaccines, particularly the MMR vaccine, and autism has been widely discredited, it is still one of the most commonly cited reasons of causing distrust in the MMR vaccine and other vaccines (Jones et al., 2012; Kata, 2012; MacDougall et al., 2015).”
BackgroundUnderstanding how the Australian vaccine‐refusal movement perceives itself
Rozbroj, T., Lyons, A., & Lucke, J. C. (2020) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13182 · Cited by 27
Blurred Shots: Investigating the Information Crisis Around Vaccination in Italy
Lovari, A., Martino, V., & Righetti, N. (2020) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764220910245 · Cited by 27
“…distrust of traditional institutions (Edelman, 2019) and by a postmodern paradigm questioning the authority and credibility of science and health (Kata, 2012), the so called “Nimbo syndrome” seems to grow in relevance (Tipaldo, 2019), where Nimbo stands for “Not In My Body,” to highlight the lay…”
BackgroundMuis, K. R., Etoubashi, N., & Denton, C. A. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101898 · Cited by 27
Liberalists and data-solutionists: redefining expertise in Twitter debates on coronavirus in Finland
Väliverronen, E., Laaksonen, S.-M., Jauho, M., & Jallinoja, P. T. (2020) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.19050210 · Cited by 27
“…expert advice and expert ‘establishments’ has been subject to contestation, for example in the cases of vaccines [e.g. Blume, 2006; Blume, 2017; Kata, 2012] and healthy eating [e.g. Gunnarsson and Elam, 2012; Jauho, 2016], by social movements as well as by ordinary lay…”
BackgroundDigging the rabbit hole, COVID-19 edition: anti-vaccine themes and the discourse around COVID-19
Smith, T. C., & Reiss, D. R. (2020) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2020.11.001 · Cited by 27
Bari, A., Heymann, M., Cohen, R. J., Zhao, R., Szabo, L., Vasandani, S. A., Khubchandani, A., DiLorenzo, M. A., & Coffee, M. P. (2022) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciac141 · Cited by 27
Trust matters: The Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in Europe Study
Vuolanto, P. H., de Almeida, A. N., Anderson, A., Auvinen, P., Beja, A., Bracke, P., Cardano, M., Ceuterick, M., Correia, T., Vito, E. D., et al. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/14034948231223791 · Cited by 27
“…not the case that media discourses are the only factor, all actors are exposed to various vaccine discourses in the mass and social media or online public sphere more broadly [14,15], HCPs therefore need to be cog-nisant of the various vaccine discourses that surround their patients and themselves.”
Ellingson, M. K., & Chamberlain, A. T. (2018) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2018.1425114 · Cited by 27
“Both topics are important from a disease prevention perspective, but can be riddled with misinformation on the Internet and elsewhere.(29,30) Additionally, as evi-”
BackgroundHow baby’s first shot determines the development of maternal attitudes towards vaccination
Betsch, C., Bödeker, B., Schmid, P., & Wichmann, O. (2018) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.023 · Cited by 27
Vaccination attitudes and mobile readiness: A survey of expectant and new mothers
Atkinson, K. M., Ducharme, R., Westeinde, J., Wilson, S. E., Deeks, S. L., Pascali, D., & Wilson, K. R. (2015) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2015.1009807 · Cited by 26
Powell, G. A., Zinszer, K., Verma, A. D., Bahk, C. Y., Madoff, L. C., Brownstein, J. S., & Buckeridge, D. L. (2016) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.067 · Cited by 26
“These trends broaden the reach of unsubstantiated health information, such as controversial claims about vaccine safety [15].”
BackgroundBekkat-Berkani, R., & Mazzotti, L. R. (2018) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.027 · Cited by 26
Baumann, A., Andersen, B. S., Østergaard, L. J., & Larsen, M. B. (2019) · Vaccine X · doi:10.1016/j.jvacx.2019.100020 · Cited by 26
Stephens, A. B., Wynn, C. S., & Stockwell, M. S. (2019) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2019.1611158 · Cited by 27
“information with themes of concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness, alternative medicine, civil liberties, conspiracy theories, and misinformation(136) often by using tactics such as skewing scientific evidence, shifting hypotheses, censoring dissent, and attacking critics.(137) Posts on social media are”
BackgroundAction bias in the public’s clinically inappropriate expectations for antibiotics.
Thorpe, A., Sirota, M., Juanchich, M., & Orbell, S. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000269 · Cited by 26
“For instance, to preserve their prior beliefs, people who are vaccine hesitant often doubt the credibility of physicians that provide positive information about vaccinations (Kata, 2012), while patients with HIV or cancer often eschew important information about their diagnosis and prognosis (Leydon et al.”
BackgroundPerception of Emergent Epidemic of COVID-2019 / SARS CoV-2 on the Polish Internet
Jarynowski, A. K., Wójta-Kempa, M., & Belik, V. (2020) · Nursing and Public Health · doi:10.17219/pzp/120054 · Cited by 26
Aggressive behaviour of anti-vaxxers and their toxic replies in English and Japanese
Miyazaki, K., Uchiba, T., Tanaka, K., & Sasahara, K. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01245-x · Cited by 26
Žeželj, I. L., Petrović, M., Ivanović, A., & Kurčubić, P. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279122 · Cited by 26
Samuel, H., & Zai͏̈ane, O. R. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89656-4_9 · Cited by 26
Koskan, A. M., Dominick, L. N., & Helitzer, D. (2019) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1007/s13187-019-01617-z · Cited by 26
A critical evaluation of science outreach via social media: its role and impact on scientists
McClain, C. R., & Neeley, L. (2014) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.5918.1 · Cited by 26
Knowledge through social networks: Accuracy, error, and polarisation
Hahn, U., Merdes, C. J., & von Sydow, M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294815 · Cited by 30
Vaccine adherence: the rate of hesitancy toward childhood immunization in Kazakhstan
Akhmetzhanova, Z., Sazonov, V., Riethmacher, D., & Aljofan, M. (2020) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1080/14760584.2020.1775080 · Cited by 25
“There is a large number of websites that promote anti-vaccination propaganda and spread baseless and wrong information [21].”
BackgroundXiao, Q., Liu, X., Wang, R., Mao, Y., Chen, H., Li, X., Liu, X., Dai, J., Gao, J., Fu, H., et al. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9090967 · Cited by 25
Mandatory and recommended vaccinations in Poland in the views of parents
Kraśnicka, J., Krajewska-Kułak, E., Klimaszewska, K., Cybulski, M., Guzowski, A., Kowalewska, B., Jankowiak, B., Rolka, H., Doroszkiewicz, H., & Kułąk, W. (2018) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2018.1496766 · Cited by 25
Davis, M. (2018) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662518817187 · Cited by 25
“…strategies for countering it (Bean, 2011; Betsch, 2011; Betsch et al., 2010, 2012; Clarke et al., 2015; Davies et al., 2002; Grant et al., 2015; Kata, 2010, 2012; Luyten et al., 2013; Moran et al., 2016; Nasir, 2000; Robichaud et al., 2012; Shelby and Ernst, 2013; Wilson and Keelan, 2013;…”
BackgroundSupporting informed decision-making about vaccination: an analysis of two official websites
Vivion, M., Hennequin, C., Verger, P., & Dubé, È. (2019) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2019.09.007 · Cited by 25
Identifying Vaccine Hesitant Communities on Twitter and their Geolocations: A Network Approach
Ruiz, J. B., Featherstone, J. D., & Barnett, G. A. (2021) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.480 · Cited by 25
“This conclusion supports previous research results that found online anti-vaccine information to include deceptive vaccine information [12, 13].”
ResultGaray, J., Yap, R., & Sabellano, M. J. (2019) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/482/1/012043 · Cited by 23
Hyland, P., Vallières, F., Hartman, T. K., McKay, R., Butter, S., Bentall, R. P., McBride, O., Shevlin, M. E., Bennett, K. M., Mason, L., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258871 · Cited by 25
“As the term implies, however, vaccine hesitancy is not immutable, and individual attitudes towards a specific vaccine can change over time as a function of a wide-range of interdependent individual, social, and vaccination-specific factors [8, 9] including, but not limited to, perceptions of susceptibility to pathogen…”
Misinformation interventions decay rapidly without an immediate posttest
Capewell, G., Maertens, R., Remshard, M., van der Linden, S., Compton, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Roozenbeek, J. (2024) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.13049 · Cited by 31
Legal approaches to promoting parental compliance with childhood immunization recommendations
Weithorn, L. A., & Reiss, D. R. (2018) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2018.1423929 · Cited by 25
Misinformation, Crisis, and Public Health—Reviewing the Literature
Starbird, K., Spiro, E. S., & Koltai, K. (2020) · doi:10.35650/md.2063.d.2020 · Cited by 24
“…(Miller et al. 2017; Bode and Vraga 2018; Dredze et al. 2016), Ebola (Allgaier and Svalastog 2015; Jin et al. 2014; Fung et al. 2016), and measles (Kata 2010, 2012; Dubé et al. 2014) over the past decade to see the troubling role of misinformation, disinformation, and conspiracy theories in…”
BackgroundReadability comparison of pro- and anti-HPV-vaccination online messages in Japan
Okuhara, T., Ishikawa, H., Okada, M., Kato, M., & Kiuchi, T. (2017) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.013 · Cited by 23
Schalkwyk, F. B. V., Dudek, J., & Costas, R. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03551-0 · Cited by 23
“Others (Bennato 2017; Bean 2011; DiResta and Lotan 2015; Kata 2012; Leask 2015) reinforce this concern, arguing that the effects of activist groups should not be underestimated.”
BackgroundBolisani, E., Navarro, J. G. C., & García-Pérez, A. (2021) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1080/14778238.2021.1911606 · Cited by 23
“Although some think that the No Vax position is just a matter of “prejudice, false beliefs, or ideological opinions”, their motivations also derive from the “official science” itself (Kata, 2012; Mazzucco, 2016).”
BackgroundAnalyzing the vaccination debate in social media data Pre- and Post-COVID-19 pandemic
Chen, Q., & Crooks, A. T. (2022) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2022.102783 · Cited by 22
“…movement may put vaccine practices at risk of being rejected, and their reach can be significantly amplified in the age of information because anti-vaccinists can disseminate the negatives about vaccination through social media (Evrony and Caplan, 2017; Kata, 2012; Smith and Graham, 2019).”
Anti-Vaccine Attitudes among Adults in the U.S. during the COVID-19 Pandemic after Vaccine Rollout
Choi, J., Lieff, S. A., Meltzer, G., Grivel, M. M., Chang, V. W., Yang, L. H., & Jarlais, D. C. D. (2022) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines10060933 · Cited by 24
“In the last decade, the anti-vaccination movement has been thriving due to a surge of vaccine misinformation being shared online [8,11].”
BackgroundHopkins, K. L., Lepage, C., Cook, W., Thomson, A., Abeyesekera, S., Knobler, S., Boehman, N., Thompson, B. I. '., Waiswa, P., Ssanyu, J. N., et al. (2023) · Journal of health communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2023.2231377 · Cited by 22
“…as potential target users–were i) youth aged 16 to 24 years, ii) parents and child caregivers, iii) medical students, The view that something natural is inherently good while unnatural things are inherently bad (Howard & Reiss, 2018; Kata, 2012; Wawrzuta, Jaworski, Gotlib, & Panczyk, 2021).”
BackgroundMunger, K. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009359795 · Cited by 26
User comments on climate stories: impacts of anecdotal vs. scientific evidence
Hinnant, A., Subramanian, R., & Young, R. (2016) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1759-1 · Cited by 23
“The present experiment focuses on how participants exposed to different types of user comments, which have been shown to skew science in other research (Kata 2012), experience uncertainty about climate change.”
MethodVaccine-Hesitant Justifications
Rodriguez, N. J. (2016) · Global Qualitative Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/2333393616663304 · Cited by 23
“The bulk of scholarship regarding vaccine discourse online has examined content produced by anti-vaccination websites (Bean, 2011; Kata, 2012).”
BackgroundPot, M., Ruiter, R. A. C., Paulussen, T. G., Heuvelink, A., de Melker, H. E., van Vliet, H., & van Keulen, H. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00226 · Cited by 23
Xu, Z., Ellis, L., & Umphrey, L. R. (2019) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198119853614 · Cited by 27
Fähnrich, B., Riedlinger, M. E., & Weitkamp, E. (2020) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.19060301 · Cited by 23
“anti-vaccine campaigns [Kata, 2012] — draws attention to the critical role that activism can play for science communication.”
BackgroundUsing Rhetorical Situations to Examine and Improve Vaccination Communication
Ihlen, Ø., Toledano, M., & Just, S. N. (2021) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.697383 · Cited by 24
“Several studies have focused on the rise of anti-vaccination groups on the Internet (Kata, 2012; Hoffman et al., 2019).”
BackgroundHolmberg, C. (2015) · International Journal of E-Politics · doi:10.4018/ijep.2015070103 · Cited by 23
Feminist Ethnography in Cyberspace: Imagining Families in the Cloud
Bjork‐James, S. (2015) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0507-8 · Cited by 21
Suomalaisten luottamus instituutioihin ja asiantuntijoihin COVID19-pandemiassa
Jallinoja, P. T., & Väliverronen, E. (2021) · Media & viestintä · doi:10.23983/mv.107298 · Cited by 37
Crisis of confidence in vaccination and the role of social media
Durach, F., Buturoiu, R., Craiu, D., Cazacu, C., & Bârgăoanu, A. (2021) · European Journal of Paediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2021.12.009 · Cited by 21
Chinn, S., & Hasell, A. (2023) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-117 · Cited by 22
A qualitative inquiry on drivers of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among adults in Kenya
Orangi, S., Mbuthia, D., Chondo, E., Ngunu, C., Kabia, E., Ojal, J., & Barasa, E. (2024) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002986 · Cited by 22
Knowledge, attitudes and opinions towards measles and the MMR vaccine across two NSW cohorts
Brieger, D. G., Edwards, M. J., Mudgil, P., & Whitehall, J. S. (2017) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12720 · Cited by 22
Memes of Gandhi and Mercury in Anti-Vaccination Discourse
Buts, J. (2020) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v8i2.2852 · Cited by 26
The future of psychiatry: clinical practice, diagnosis, and treatment
Turner, S., Yadav, P., Morrin, H., & Bhat, A. (2025) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540261.2025.2594523 · Cited by 23
O movimento antivacina no YouTube nos tempos de pós-verdade: Educação em saúde ou desinformação?
da Costa, B. B., Viegas, D. D. J., Moreira, T. A., & Abreu, P. A. (2020) · Revista Mídia e Cotidiano · doi:10.22409/rmc.v14i1.38210 · Cited by 21
Mapping the Narrative Ecosystem of Conspiracy Theories in Online Anti-vaccination Discussions
Introne, J. E., Korsunska, A., Krsova, L., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · International Conference on Social Media and Society (SMSociety) · doi:10.1145/3400806.3400828 · Cited by 21
Comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within Twitter and survey data
Nowak, S. A., Chen, C., Parker, A. M., Gidengil, C. A., & Matthews, L. J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239826 · Cited by 21
Ophir, Y., Walter, N., Walter, D., Velho, R., Lokmanoglu, A. D., Pruden, M. L., & Andrews, E. A. (2022) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2022.2054102 · Cited by 21
“For example, should people who strongly identify as being part of the anti-vaccine movement (Kata, 2012) be considered vaccine hesitant, when in fact their refusal is solid and decisive (Bedford et al., 2018)?”
BackgroundReavis, R. D., Ebbs, J. B., Onunkwo, A. K., & Sage, L. M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181368 · Cited by 20
Adolescents trust physicians for vaccine information more than their parents or religious leaders
Griffin, D. S., Muhlbauer, G., & Griffin, D. O. (2018) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01006 · Cited by 21
Neighbourhood influence on the fourth dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccination
Hegde, S. T., Wagner, A. L., Clarke, P. J., Potter, R. C., Swanson, R. G., & Boulton, M. L. (2019) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2018.11.009 · Cited by 21
Rhetorical Appeals and Tactics in New York Times Comments About Vaccines: Qualitative Analysis
Gallagher, J., & Lawrence, H. Y. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/19504 · Cited by 21
Kärki, K. (2021) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-021-10055-y · Cited by 21
“Kata has argued that the anti-vaccine movement takes advantage of this postmodern medical paradigm by framing the refusal to be vaccinated as part of the patient’s choice (Kata 2012: 3784).”
BackgroundRepertoires of Vaccine Refusal in Romania
Toth, C. (2020) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines8040757 · Cited by 20
The Face-to-Face Principle: Science, Trust, Democracy and the Internet
Collins, H. M., Evans, R., Innes, M., Kennedy, E. B., Mason‐Wilkes, W., & McLevey, J. (2022) · Cardiff University eBooks · doi:10.18573/book7 · Cited by 20
Murero, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2023.1141416 · Cited by 35
“Vaccination attitudes and behaviors: From traditional theories to CIB Vaccine opposition, hesitancy, and acceptance (Kata, 2012; Xu and Guo, 2018 ; Eichhorn et al., 2022) have existed as long as vaccination itself (Durbach, 2000) and date back to 1796 when the British doctor, Edward Jenner…”
BackgroundIs It Time for Vaccination to “Go Viral”?
Philip, R. K., Marla Shapiro, C. M., Paterson, P., Glismann, S., & Damme, P. V. (2016) · The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal · doi:10.1097/inf.0000000000001321 · Cited by 20
“In the age of the Internet and mass communication, power has shifted from doctors to their patients.(51) People have now”
BackgroundA path model of psychosocial constructs predicting future Zika vaccine uptake intent
Guidry, J. P. D., Carlyle, K. E., Perrin, P. B., LaRose, J. G., Ryan, M. H., & Messner, M. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.064 · Cited by 20
Amaral, A. D. R., Jung, A.-K., Braun, L.-M., & Blanco, B. (2022) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v10i2.5037 · Cited by 22
“Anti‐vaccine messages are more widespread and unin‐ hibited on the Internet than in other forms of media (Kata, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialRepresenting vaccine misinformation using ontologies
Amith, M. “., & Tao, C. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Semantics · doi:10.1186/s13326-018-0190-0 · Cited by 20
“Other figures, like U.S. President Donald Trump [10], Robert Kennedy, Jr of the Kennedy family [11], Dr. Robert Sears [12], Alex Jones [13], Bill Maher [14], Jenny McCarthy [15, 16], etc., have continued to express distorted claims about vaccines.”
BackgroundMcAndrew, S., & Allington, D. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/j7srx · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Kata, A.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Kata, Anna
- ORCID
- Kata, Anna
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 3778-3789
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062321610
- Cited by
- 1,094
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 56.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vaccine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- anti-vaccine movement, anti-vaccine activism, Web 2.0, misinformation, vaccine hesitancy, user-generated content, science communication, online health information
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Decision Making, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Vaccination, Vaccines, Health Communication, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review