The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Wakefield, A., Murch, S., Anthony, A., Linnell, J., Casson, D., Malik, M., Berelowitz, M., Dhillon, A., Thomson, M., Harvey, P., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11096-0 · Cited by 3,006
RetractedInternet encyclopaedias go head to head
Giles, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/438900a · Cited by 1,978
Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.115.3.401 · Cited by 1,882
Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x · Cited by 1,443
A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet
Kata, A. (2010) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022 · Cited by 1,208
Kata, A. (2012) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112 · Cited by 1,094
Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870440008400299 · Cited by 797
A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory
Reyna, V. F. (2008) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x08327066 · Cited by 602
Self-citationEnhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: use of Web 2.0 social media
Thackeray, R., Neiger, B. L., Hanson, C. L., & McKenzie, J. F. (2008) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839908325335 · Cited by 530
eHealth Trends in Europe 2005-2007: A Population-Based Survey
Kummervold, P. E., Chronaki, C. E., Lausen, B., Prokosch, H.-U., Rasmussen, J., Santana, S., Staniszewski, A., & Wangberg, S. C. (2008) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1023 · Cited by 449
Cited by
Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review
Suarez-Lledo, V., & Alvarez-Galvez, J. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/17187 · Cited by 1,564
Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action
Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Rothman, A. J., Leask, J., & Kempe, A. (2017) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618760521 · Cited by 1,233
Self-citationPuri, N., Coomes, E. A., Haghbayan, H., & Gunaratne, K. (2020) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846 · Cited by 1,157
Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate
Broniatowski, D. A., Jamison, A. M., Qi, S., AlKulaib, L., Chen, T., Benton, A., Quinn, S. C., & Dredze, M. (2018) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2018.304567 · Cited by 1,149
Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications
Dubé, E., Vivion, M., & MacDonald, N. E. (2015) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1586/14760584.2015.964212 · Cited by 986
Metadata
- Authors
- Betsch, C., Brewer, N. T., Brocard, P., Davies, P., Gaissmaier, W., Haase, N., Leask, J., Renkewitz, F., Renner, B., Reyna, V. F., Rossmann, C., Sachse, K., Schachinger, A., Siegrist, M., & Stryk, M.
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 3727-3733
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983686394
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 22.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025
- The paper
- Betsch, C., Brewer, N. T., Brocard, P., Davies, P., Gaissmaier, W., Haase, N., Leask, J., Renkewitz, F., Renner, B., Reyna, V. F., Rossmann, C., Sachse, K., Schachinger, A., Siegrist, M., & Stryk, M. (2012). Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
