Cited by 603Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory

Open access
Reyna, Valerie F.·2008·Medical Decision Making

Abstract

The tenets of fuzzy trace theory are summarized with respect to their relevance to health and medical decision making. Illustrations are given for HIV prevention, cardiovascular disease, surgical risk, genetic risk, and cancer prevention and control. A core idea of fuzzy trace theory is that people rely on the gist of information, its bottom-line meaning, as opposed to verbatim details in judgment and decision making. This idea explains why precise information (e.g., about risk) is not necessarily effective in encouraging prevention behaviors or in supporting medical decision making. People can get the facts right, and still not derive the proper meaning, which is key to informed decision making. Getting the gist is not sufficient, however. Retrieval (e.g., of health-related values) and processing interference brought on by thinking about nested or overlapping classes (e.g., in ratio concepts, such as probability) are also important. Theory-based interventions that work (and why they work) are presented, ranging from specific techniques aimed at enhancing representation, retrieval, and processing to a comprehensive intervention that integrates these components.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272989x08327066

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social and contextual cues can bias the way adolescents perceive the risk involved in certain behaviors.

    “Social and contextual cues can bias the way adolescents perceive the risk involved in certain behaviors (Reyna 2008, Reyna & Adam 2003, Reyna & Farley 2006).”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Reyna 2008

    The section “Interventions That Mainly Affect Representation and Retrieval” (page unavailable) says retrieval cues increase perceptions of STD risk in populations including high school students, and that contextual cues can signal risk. The paper also discusses adolescents’ perceptions of drug-use risk in “Why Precise Information Does Not Work” (page unavailable). These passages support the contextual-cue and adolescent-risk elements, but do not establish the claimed effect of social cues on adolescents’ risk perceptions. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Until now, all training procedures that yielded promising results in addiction did so in adult samples.

    “Note that until now, all of these training-procedures, which yielded promising results in addiction, did so in adult samples (either students or adults with addiction problems; however, see Reyna, 2008, for training aimed at healthrelated decision-making in adolescents).”

    From Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation (2011) · cites this paper as Reyna, 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]Reyna VF Brainerd CJ Wright G Ayton P The origins of probability judgment: a review of data and theories. Subjective Probability 1994 239 72 John Wiley New York
  2. [67]Wolfe CR Reyna VF The effects of analogy and transparency of set relationships on estimating joint probabilities 2008 Manuscript under review

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reyna, V. F.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Reyna, Valerie F.
Venue
Medical Decision Making
Published
2008-11
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
850-865
ISSN
  • 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-681X
OpenAlex
W2136995860
Cited by
602
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 37
FWCI
12.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH061211, MH-061211)
  • National Cancer Institute (R13CA126359)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
fuzzy-trace theory, health behavior, risk perception, HIV prevention, cardiovascular disease, surgical risk, genetic risk, cancer prevention, retrieval, ratio concept, probability judgment, theory-based intervention
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Decision Making, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Models, Psychological, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Health Behavior, HIV Infections, Fuzzy Logic, Risk Assessment, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review