Cited by 20Wound Healing and TreatmentsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Establishment of a cell-based wound healing assay for bio-relevant testing of wound therapeutics

Planz, Viktoria, Wang, Jing, Windbergs, Maike·2018·Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods

Abstract

Introduction Predictive in vitro testing of novel wound therapeutics requires adequate cell-based bio-assays. Such assays represent an integral part during preclinical development as pre-step before entering in vivo studies. Simple "scratch tests" based on defected skin cell monolayers exist, however these can solely be used for testing liquids, as cell monolayer destruction and excessive hydration limit their applicability for (semi-)solid systems like wound dressings. In this context, a cell-based wound healing assay is introduced for rapid and predictive testing of wound therapeutics independent of their physical state in a bio-relevant environment. Methods A novel wound healing assay was established for bio-relevant and predictive testing of (semi-) solid wound therapeutics. Results The assay allows for physiologically relevant hydration of the tested wound therapeutics at the air-liquid interface and their removal without cell monolayer disruption. In a proof-of-concept study, the applicability and discriminative power could be demonstrated by examining unloaded and drug-loaded wound dressings with two different established wound healing actives (dexpanthenol and metyrapone) and their effect on skin cell behavior. The influence of the released drug on the cells´ healing behavior could successfully be monitored over time. Wound size assessment after 96h resulted in an eight fold smaller wound area for drug treated models compared to the ones treated with unloaded fibers a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vascn.2017.10.003

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Planz, V., Wang, J., & Windbergs, M.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Windbergs, Maike
Venue
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
89
Pages
19-25
ISSN
1056-8719 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2761307601
Cited by
19
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
wound dressings, air-liquid interface, drug release, dexpanthenol, metyrapone, preclinical screening
MeSH terms
Proof of Concept Study, Bandages, Biological Assay, Cell Line, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Metyrapone, Pantothenic Acid, Skin, Time Factors, Wound Healing, Keratinocytes, Cell Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review