Cited by 52Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal and yeast genetics research

Polyclonal Aspergillus fumigatus infection in captive penguins

Open access
Alvarez-Perez, Sergio, Mateos, Ana, Dominguez, Lucas, Martinez-Nevado, Eva, Blanco, Jose L., Garcia, Marta E.·2010·Veterinary Microbiology

Abstract

Aspergillus fumigatus is a known opportunistic pathogen of penguins. Most reports of penguin aspergillosis have focused on clinical, histopathological and microbiological findings. The molecular characterization of A. fumigatus isolates involved in invasive infections in penguins has yet to be addressed. The aim of this work was to study the possible coexistence of different A. fumigatus genotypes in five clinical cases of invasive aspergillosis in captive penguins. Differences in other relevant characteristics of the isolates, including mating type and invasiveness, were also considered. Alkaline protease and elastase production by the A. fumigatus isolates was evaluated by plate assays. Random amplified polymorphic DNA, and microsatellite analysis techniques were used for molecular typing, and mating type (MAT1-1 or MAT1-2) was determined by multiplex PCR. Although all isolates showed protease activity, differences in elastase activity were observed. The typing techniques indicated different genotypes in all the penguins, although one genotype was predominant in some cases. Fungal strains of different mating type were found in two different penguins, confirming infection polyclonality. In conclusion, captive penguins are susceptible to infection by multiple strains of A. fumigatus that differ not only in their genotype, but also in mating type and invasiveness. This finding has important consequences for the diagnosis and treatment of avian aspergillosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.02.026

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aspergillus spores are hydrophobic and approximately 2.5 μm in diameter, allowing them to pass through the trachea to reach the air sacs and lungs and cause aspergillosis in immunocompromised humans and animals.

    “Their spores are hydrophobic and extremely small, with a diameter of approximately 2.5 µm. Therefore, they easily pass through the trachea to reach the air sacs and lungs, which causes aspergillosis, a respiratory infection in immunocompromised humans and animals [4,20].”

    From Nationwide Survey about the Occurrence of Aspergillosis in Captive Penguins in Zoos and Aquariums in Japan (2023) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes aspergillosis as a fungal infection in birds, and §2.1 (Animals) reports A. fumigatus infection and lesions in the lungs and air sacs of penguins. Our copy does not state that spores are hydrophobic or approximately 2.5 µm across, that they pass through the trachea, or that this mechanism causes disease in immunocompromised humans and animals. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Aspergillosis is considered an opportunistic infectious disease.

    “Aspergillosis is considered an opportunistic infectious disease [4,20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alvarez-Perez, S., Mateos, A., Dominguez, L., Martinez-Nevado, E., Blanco, J. L., & Garcia, M. E.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Venue
Veterinary Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
144
Issue
3-4
Pages
444-449
ISSN
0378-1135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073832862
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Veterinary Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BURJC Digital (King Juan Carlos University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Consejería de Salud y Familias, Junta de Andalucía (AP 2005-1034)
  • Ministério da Educação e Ciência
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Aspergillus fumigatus, invasive aspergillosis, penguins, captive birds, polyclonal infection, fungal genotypes, mating type, MAT1-1, MAT1-2, alkaline protease, elastase production, avian aspergillosis, molecular typing, microsatellite analysis, RAPD typing
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Zoo, Aspergillosis, Aspergillus fumigatus, DNA, Fungal, Female, Male, Genome, Fungal, Microsatellite Repeats, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique, Insomnia, Fatal Familial, Spheniscidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review