Cited by 106Parasitic infections in humans and animalsHelminth infection and controlToxoplasma gondii Research Studies

Prevalence of zoonotic important parasites in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Great Britain

Smith, G·2003·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

A national necropsy survey of red foxes was carried out across Great Britain to record Echinococcus, Trichinella and Toxoplasma. The survey did not record directly, or indirectly using coproantigen/PCR tests, evidence for the presence of Echinococcus multilocularis in 588 animals, although E. granulosus was suspected in six animals. Parasitological evidence for Trichinella spp. could not be found in 587 fox muscle digests, and a specific PCR test also failed to detect Toxoplasma in a sub-set of 61 random fox tongue biopsies. The upper 95% confidence interval for the above parasites was 0.60% (E. multilocularis), 0.60% (Trichinella spp.) and 5.6% (Toxoplasma). The commonest gut parasites were the hookworm Uncinaria stenocephala (41.3%) and the ascarid Toxocara canis (61.6%). This study also reports the second occurrence of Trichuris vulpis in Great Britain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.09.017

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In other parts of Europe, the percentage of A. alata infected foxes differs depending on the investigation and region, from very high to moderate and low to areas where these trematodes were not detected.

    “In other parts of Europe, the percentage of A. alata infected foxes differs depending on the investigation (and region) from very high [3,34], moderate, and low [1,8,12,18,19,35] to areas where these trematodes were not detected [17,36,37].”
  • The vast majority of hookworms detected in the study belonged to Uncinaria stenocephala.

    “In our investigation, species of these helminths were not identified, but previous studies carried out in Poland [20,31,41,42] and Europe [1,17,18,19] may suggest that the vast majority of them belonged to Uncinaria stenocephala.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, G.
Affiliations
Fera Science (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, G
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12-01
Volume
118
Issue
1-2
Pages
133-142
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986924348
Cited by
106
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Keywords
red fox, zoonotic parasites, Echinococcus multilocularis, Echinococcus granulosus, Trichinella, Toxoplasma, Trichuris vulpis, Uncinaria stenocephala, Toxocara canis, parasite prevalence, Great Britain
MeSH terms
Animals, Echinococcosis, Echinococcus, Female, Foxes, United Kingdom, Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic, Intestine, Small, Male, Toxoplasma, Toxoplasmosis, Animal, Trichinella, Trichinellosis, Zoonoses, Prevalence, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review