Cited by 63Parasite Biology and Host InteractionsHelminth infection and controlMollusks and Parasites Studies

The Helminth Community of the Red Fox, Vulpes Vulpes, In Dunas de Mira (Portugal) and its effect on host condition

Eira, C., Vingada, J., Torres, J., Miquel, J.·2006·Wildlife Biology in Practice

Abstract

The analysis of 62 foxes collected by hunters between 2000 and 2006 revealed that the helminth community of the red fox in Dunas de Mira is composed by 20 species. Over 90% of the foxes were parasitized and a maximum of 8 species was recorded in an individual fox. The overall mean species richness was 2.7. The component species were Uncinaria stenocephala (77.4%), Toxocara canis (37.1%), Mesocestoides spp. (30.7%), Alaria alata (27.4%), Ascocotyle longa (24.2%), Angiostrongylus vasorum (16.1%), and Spirocerca lupi (12.9%). Ascocotyle longa presented the highest mean intensity (268.5). The prevalence of U. stenocephala in males (86.8%) was significantly higher than that found in females (62.5%). The measures of host body condition indicate an overall KFI of 1.42 with male foxes presenting relatively lower KFI values than females (1.37 and 1.52, respectively). The infection by T. canis , Mesocestoides spp., and both T. canis and U. stenocephala produced significant effects upon host condition. The component species are discussed considering the red fox diet in the study area, their relationship with a lowered host condition and their possible transmission to humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2461/wbp.2006.2.5

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Portugal, the prevalence of D. immitis in red foxes, as determined by necropsy, has ranged from 3.2% in northern-Centre locations, such as Coimbra, to 11.8% in southern and central-Centre districts, such as Santarém and Setúbal.

    “In Portugal, the prevalence of D. immitis in red foxes, as determined by necropsy, has ranged from 3.2% in northern-Centre locations, such as Coimbra [42], to 11.8% in southern and central-Centre districts, such as Santarém and Setúbal [43]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eira, C., Vingada, J., Torres, J., & Miquel, J.
Venue
Wildlife Biology in Practice
Published
2006-10-06
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1646-1509 (ISSN-L)
  • 1646-2742
OpenAlex
W2078228304
Cited by
63
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wildlife Biology in Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Mollusks and Parasites Studies
Keywords
red fox, helminth communities, parasite prevalence, host body condition, Uncinaria stenocephala, Toxocara canis, Mesocestoides, Angiostrongylus vasorum, Spirocerca lupi, sex differences in infection, parasite transmission to humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review