The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Replication of SARS coronavirus administered into the respiratory tract of African Green, rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys
Open accessAbstract
SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) administered intranasally and intratracheally to rhesus, cynomolgus and African Green monkeys (AGM) replicated in the respiratory tract but did not induce illness. The titer of serum neutralizing antibodies correlated with the level of virus replication in the respiratory tract (AGM>cynomolgus>rhesus). Moderate to high titers of SARS-CoV with associated interstitial pneumonitis were detected in the lungs of AGMs on day 2 and were resolving by day 4 post-infection. Following challenge of AGMs 2 months later, virus replication was highly restricted and there was no evidence of enhanced disease. These species will be useful for the evaluation of the immunogenicity of candidate vaccines, but the lack of apparent clinical illness in all three species, variability from animal to animal in level of viral replication, and rapid clearance of virus and pneumonitis in AGMs must be taken into account by investigators considering the use of these species in efficacy and challenge studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome
Drosten, C., Günther, S., Preiser, W., van der Werf, S., Brodt, H.-R., Becker, S., Rabenau, H., Panning, M., Kolesnikova, L., Fouchier, R. A. M., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030747 · Cited by 4,574
Skiadopoulos, M. H., Tatem, J. M., Surman, S. R., Mitcho, Y., Wu, S.-L., Elkins, W. R., & Murphy, B. R. (2002) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00038-5 · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Cited by
Return of the Coronavirus: 2019-nCoV
Gralinski, L. E., & Menachery, V. D. (2020) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v12020135 · Cited by 1,348
Coronavirus Pathogenesis and the Emerging Pathogen Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
Weiss, S. R., & Navas-Martin, S. (2005) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.69.4.635-664.2005 · Cited by 1,256
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection
Cheng, V. C. C., Lau, S. K. P., Woo, P. C. Y., & Yuen, K. Y. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00023-07 · Cited by 1,192
Lethal Infection of K18- hACE2 Mice Infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
McCray, P. B., Pewe, L., Wohlford-Lenane, C., Hickey, M., Manzel, L., Shi, L., Netland, J., Jia, H. P., Halabi, C., Sigmund, C. D., et al. (2007) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.02012-06 · Cited by 1,010
Lin, L., Lu, L., Cao, W., & Li, T. (2020) · Emerging Microbes & Infections · doi:10.1080/22221751.2020.1746199 · Cited by 914
Metadata
- Authors
- McAuliffe, J., Vogel, L., Roberts, A., Fahle, G., Fischer, S., Shieh, W.-J., Butler, E., Zaki, S., St. Claire, M., Murphy, B., & Subbarao, K.
- Venue
- Virology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 330
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-15
- ISSN
- 0042-6822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024845268
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Replication of SARS coronavirus administered into the respiratory tract of African Green, rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.virol.2004.09.030
- The paper
- McAuliffe, J., Vogel, L., Roberts, A., Fahle, G., Fischer, S., Shieh, W.-J., Butler, E., Zaki, S., St. Claire, M., Murphy, B., & Subbarao, K. (2004). Replication of SARS coronavirus administered into the respiratory tract of African Green, rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys. Virology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2004.09.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
