The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Norovirus classification and proposed strain nomenclature
Open accessAbstract
Without a virus culture system, genetic analysis becomes the principal method to classify norovirus (NoV) strains. Currently, classification of NoV strains beneath the species level has been based on sequences from different regions of the viral genome. As a result, the phylogenetic insights of some virus were not appropriately interpreted, and no consensus has been reached to establish a uniform classification scheme. To provide a consistent and reliable scientific basis for classifying NoVs, we analyzed the amino acid sequences for the major capsid protein of 164 NoV strains by first using an alignment based on the predicted 3D structures. A Bayesian tree was generated, and the maximum likelihood pairwise distances of the aligned sequences were used to evaluate the results from the uncorrected pairwise distance method. Analyses of the pairwise distances demonstrated three clearly resolved peaks, suggesting that NoV strains beneath the species level can be classified at three levels: strain (S), cluster (C), and genogroup (G). The uncorrected pairwise distance ranges for S, C, and G were 0-14.1%, 14.3-43.8%, and 44.9-61.4%, respectively. A scheme with 29 genetic clusters [8 in genogroup 1 (G1), 17 in G2, 2 in G3, and 1 each in G4 and G5] was defined on the basis of the tree topology with the standards provided and was supported by the distance analysis. Of these, five clusters in G2 and one in G1 are newly described. This analysis can serve as the basis for a standardized nomenclature to genetically describe NoV strains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Updated classification of norovirus genogroups and genotypes
Chhabra, P., de Graaf, M., Parra, G. I., Chan, M. C.-W., Green, K., Martella, V., Wang, Q., White, P. A., Katayama, K., Vennema, H., et al. (2019) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/jgv.0.001318 · Cited by 895
Rapid Evolution of Pandemic Noroviruses of the GII.4 Lineage
Bull, R. A., Eden, J.-S., Rawlinson, W. D., & White, P. A. (2010) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000831 · Cited by 301
Choi, J.-M., Hutson, A. M., Estes, M. K., & Prasad, B. V. V. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0803275105 · Cited by 268
The dynamics of norovirus outbreak epidemics: Recent insights
Marshall, J. A., & Bruggink, L. D. (2011) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph8041141 · Cited by 88
Yinda, C. K., Vanhulle, E., Conceição-Neto, N., Beller, L., Deboutte, W., Shi, C., Ghogomu, S. M., Maes, P., Van Ranst, M., & Matthijnssens, J. (2019) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00585-18 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, D.-P., Ando, T., Fankhauser, R. L., Beard, R. S., Glass, R. I., & Monroe, S. S.
- Venue
- Virology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 346
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 312-323
- ISSN
- 0042-6822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145719673
- Cited by
- 1,093
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Norovirus classification and proposed strain nomenclature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.virol.2005.11.015
- The paper
- Zheng, D.-P., Ando, T., Fankhauser, R. L., Beard, R. S., Glass, R. I., & Monroe, S. S. (2006). Norovirus classification and proposed strain nomenclature. Virology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2005.11.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.