The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microsaccade dynamics during covert attention
Open accessAbstract
We compared effects of covert spatial-attention shifts induced with exogenous or endogenous cues on microsaccade rate and direction. Separate and dissociated effects were obtained in rate and direction measures. Display changes caused microsaccade rate inhibition, followed by sustained rate enhancement. Effects on microsaccade direction were differentially tied to cue class (exogenous vs. endogenous) and type (neutral vs. directional). For endogenous cues, direction effects were weak and occurred late. Exogenous cues caused a fast direction bias towards the cue (i.e., early automatic triggering of saccade programs), followed by a shift in the opposite direction (i.e, controlled inhibition of cue-directed saccades, leading to a 'leakage' of microsaccades in the opposite direction).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 2×
“…microsaccades were shown (1) to exhibit a characteristic temporal signature of display-change related rate inhibition and enhancement in the Posner (1980) spatial cueing paradigm and (2) to be oriented in the direction of endogenous cues (Engbert & Kliegl, 2003; see also Hafed & Clark,…”
BackgroundResultInvoluntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030 · Cited by 2,487
Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention
Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00084-1 · Cited by 1,390
Self-citationThe role of attention in the programming of saccades
Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E. (1995) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00279-u · Cited by 1,302
Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets
Theeuwes, J. (1991) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211619 · Cited by 814
Cited by
Transient induced gamma-band response in EEG as a manifestation of miniature saccades
Yuval-Greenberg, S., Tomer, O., Keren, A. S., Nelken, I., & Deouell, L. Y. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.027 · Cited by 776
Microsaccades: Small steps on a long way
Rolfs, M. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.010 · Cited by 521
The impact of microsaccades on vision: towards a unified theory of saccadic function
Martinez-Conde, S., Otero-Millan, J., & Macknik, S. L. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3405 · Cited by 461
The saccadic spike artifact in MEG
Carl, C., Açık, A., König, P., Engel, A. K., & Hipp, J. F. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.020 · Cited by 110
Common Priority Map for Selection History, Reward and Emotion in the Oculomotor System
Belopolsky, A. V. (2015) · Perception · doi:10.1177/0301006615596866 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Laubrock, J., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 721-730
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026418412
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microsaccade dynamics during covert attention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.029
- The paper
- Laubrock, J., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Microsaccade dynamics during covert attention. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
