Cited by 42Visual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Common Priority Map for Selection History, Reward and Emotion in the Oculomotor System

Belopolsky, Artem V.·2015·Perception

Abstract

In natural scenes, many objects compete for visual selection. However, it is not always clear why certain objects win this competition. I will demonstrate that the eye movement system lives in a constant state of competition among different oculomotor programs. This competition is not limited to the competition between the current goals of the observer and salient objects in the environment but incorporates independent influences from memory, reward, and emotional systems. These involuntary and automatic biases often overcome the goal-directed selection and expose severe limits in goal-driven control. There is also a striking similarity in the way that these very different sources of bias activate the oculomotor system and compete for representation. The inputs from various information sources are integrated in the common map in the oculomotor system for the sole purpose of improving the efficiency of oculomotor selection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0301006615596866

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both reward and negative valence may influence attentional selection via an at least partially overlapping mechanism.

    “The similarities between the studies concerned with reward and those concerned with negative valence suggest that both factors may influence attentional selection via an, at least partially, overlapping mechanism (for a similar claim, see Belopolsky, 2015; Schmidt et al., 2015b).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Belopolsky, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belopolsky, A. V.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Belopolsky, Artem V.
Venue
Perception
Published
2015-08
Volume
44
Issue
8-9
Pages
920-933
ISSN
  • 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4233
OpenAlex
W2305250356
Cited by
42
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
oculomotor system, eye movements, visual selection, selection history, reward, emotions, memory, goal-directed control, salient objects, information integration
MeSH terms
Arousal, Attention, Choice Behavior, Emotions, Eye Movements, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Orientation, Psychophysics, Mental Recall, Reward, Visual Perception, Repetition Priming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review