Cited by 1,302Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionMotor Control and Adaptation

The role of attention in the programming of saccades

Open access
Kowler, Eileen, Anderson, Eric, Dosher, Barbara, Blaser, Erik·1995·Vision Research

Abstract

Accurate saccadic programming in natural visual scenes requires a signal designating which of the many potential targets is to be the goal of the saccade. Is this signal controlled by the allocation of perceptual attention, or do saccades have their own independent selective filter? We found evidence for the involvement of perceptual attention, namely: (1) summoning perceptual attention to a target also facilitated saccades; (2) perceptual identification was better at the saccadic goal than elsewhere; and (3) attempts to dissociate the locus of attention from the saccadic goal were unsuccessful, i.e. it was not possible to prepare to look quickly and accurately at one target while at the same time making highly accurate perceptual judgements about targets elsewhere. We also studied the trade-off between saccadic and perceptual performance by means of a novel application of the "attentional operating characteristic" (AOC) to oculomotor performance. This analysis revealed that some attention could be diverted from the saccadic goal with virtually no cost to either saccadic latency or accuracy, showing that there is a ceiling on the attentional demands of saccades. The links we discovered between saccades and attention can be explained by a model in which perceptual attention determines the endpoint of the saccade, while a separate trigger signal initiates the saccade in response to transient changes in the attentional locus. The model will be discussed in the context of current neurophysiological work on saccadic control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00279-u

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The measurement of eye movements allows the recording of all the temporal and spatial features of fixation and saccadic movements, which are considered a key part of the attentional mechanisms.

    “In this line, the measurement of eye movements allows the recording of all the temporal and spatial features of fixation and saccadic movements, which are considered a key part of the attentional mechanisms,61”

    From Effectiveness of a projection-based augmented reality exposure system in treating cockroach phobia: Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [61]

    The Eye movement recording and Analysis of eye movement data sections describe recording eye position and measuring saccade onset, offset, and size. The General Discussion links accurate saccades to shifts of perceptual attention. The paper does not establish that eye-movement measurement captures all temporal and spatial features of both fixations and saccades; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Wurtz, R. H. & Goldberg, M. E. (Eds) Reviews of oculomotor research, Iiol. 3, The neurobiology of saccadic eye movements (pp. 315-336). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  2. Coeffe, C. (1987). Two ways of improving saccadic accuracy. In O'Regan, J. K. and Levy-Schoen, A. (Eds), Eye movement: From physiology to cognition (pp. 105-113). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland.
  3. Kinchla, R. A. (1992). Attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 711-742.
  4. Shaw, M. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial locations: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance increments. In Bouma, H. & Bouwhuis, D. G. (Eds) Attention and performance X. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Kowler, Eileen
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-07
Volume
35
Issue
13
Pages
1897-1916
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088089777
Cited by
1,302
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 51
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
saccades, perceptual attention, saccade latency, saccadic accuracy, perceptual identification, oculomotor performance
MeSH terms
Attention, Cues, Female, Humans, Models, Biological, Psychophysics, Saccades, Time Factors, Vision, Monocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review