The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual perception of materials and their properties
Open accessAbstract
Misidentifying materials-such as mistaking soap for pâté, or vice versa-could lead to some pretty messy mishaps. Fortunately, we rarely suffer such indignities, thanks largely to our outstanding ability to recognize materials-and identify their properties-by sight. In everyday life, we encounter an enormous variety of materials, which we usually distinguish effortlessly and without error. However, despite its subjective ease, material perception poses the visual system with some unique and significant challenges, because a given material can take on many different appearances depending on the lighting, viewpoint and shape. Here, I use observations from recent research on material perception to outline a general theory of material perception, in which I suggest that the visual system does not actually estimate physical parameters of materials and objects. Instead-I argue-the brain is remarkably adept at building 'statistical generative models' that capture the natural degrees of variation in appearance between samples. For example, when determining perceived glossiness, the brain does not estimate parameters of the BRDF. Instead, it uses a constellation of low- and mid-level image measurements to characterize the extent to which the surface manifests specular reflections. I argue that these 'statistical appearance models' are both more expressive and easier to compute than physical parameters, and therefore represent a powerful middle way between a 'bag of tricks' and 'inverse optics'.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding
Roweis, S. T., & Saul, L. K. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2323 · Cited by 14,965
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope
Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2001) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1011139631724 · Cited by 6,319
Land, E. H., & McCann, J. J. (1971) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.61.000001 · Cited by 4,095
Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data
Schmidt, M., & Lipson, H. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165893 · Cited by 2,890
Gazzaniga, M. S., & Bizzi, E. (2000) · Cited by 2,547
Internal models in the cerebellum
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2 · Cited by 2,469
80 Million Tiny Images: A Large Data Set for Nonparametric Object and Scene Recognition
Torralba, A., Fergus, R., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.128 · Cited by 1,921
Theory for Off-Specular Reflection From Roughened Surfaces*
Torrance, K. E., & Sparrow, E. M. (1967) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.57.001105 · Cited by 1,855
How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192788 · Cited by 1,815
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleming, R. W.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 94
- Pages
- 62-75
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166150182
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual perception of materials and their properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.visres.2013.11.004
- The paper
- Fleming, R. W. (2014). Visual perception of materials and their properties. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.11.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.