The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction
Open accessAbstract
During the past decades, construction and demolition (C&D) waste issues have received increasing attention from both practitioners and researchers around the world. A plethora of research relating to C&D waste management (WM) has been published in scholarly journals. However, a comprehensive understanding of the C&D WM research is somehow absent in spite of its proliferation. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework that helps readers understand the C&D WM research as archived in selected journals. Papers under the topic of C&D WM are retrieved based on a set of rigorous procedures. The information of these papers is then analyzed with the assistance of the Qualitative Social Research (QSR) software package NVivo. A framework for understanding C&D WM research is created based on the analytic results. By following the framework, a bibliometric analysis of research in C&D WM is presented, followed by an in-depth literature analysis. It is found that C&D generation, reduction, and recycling are the three major topics in the discipline of C&D WM. Future research is recommended to (a) investigate C&D waste issues in wider scopes including design, maintenance and demolition, (b) develop a unified measurement for waste generation so that WM performance can be compared across various economies, and (c) enhance effectiveness of WM approaches (e.g. waste charging scheme) based on new WM concepts (e.g. Extended Producer Responsibility). In addition to the above research findings, the approach for producing the research framework can be useful references for other studies which attempt to understand the research of a given discipline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brundtland, G. H. (1991) · Earth and Us · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5 · Cited by 12,174
Construction Waste: Quantification and Source Evaluation
Bossink, B. A. G., & Brouwers, H. J. H. (1996) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1996)122:1(55 · Cited by 578
Jackson, R. L., Drummond, D. K., & Camara, S. (2007) · Qualitative Research Reports in Communication · doi:10.1080/17459430701617879 · Cited by 515
Architects’ perspectives on construction waste reduction by design
Osmani, M., Glass, J., & Price, A. D. F. (2008) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.011 · Cited by 496
A review on the viable technology for construction waste recycling
Tam, V. W. Y., & Tam, C. M. (2006) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.12.002 · Cited by 477
Modelling municipal solid waste generation: A review
Beigl, P., Lebersorger, S., & Salhofer, S. (2008) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2006.12.011 · Cited by 435
Material Waste in Building Industry: Main Causes and Prevention
Formoso, C. T., Soibelman, L., De Cesare, C., & Isatto, E. L. (2002) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2002)128:4(316 · Cited by 434
Jaillon, L., & Poon, C. S. (2008) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446190802259043 · Cited by 405
Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand
Kofoworola, O. F., & Gheewala, S. H. (2009) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.004 · Cited by 346
The use of recycled aggregate in concrete in Hong Kong
Poon, C.-S., & Chan, D. (2007) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.06.005 · Cited by 321
Cited by
Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207 · Cited by 706
Esa, M. R., Halog, A., & Rigamonti, L. (2017) · Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management · doi:10.1007/s10163-016-0516-x · Cited by 275
Critical Management Practices Influencing On-Site Waste Minimization in Construction Projects
Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., Alaka, H. A., & Owolabi, H. A. (2017) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.040 · Cited by 200
Park, J., & Tucker, R. (2017) · International Journal of Construction Management · doi:10.1080/15623599.2016.1192248 · Cited by 180
Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., Hosseini, M. R., Martek, I., Li, H. X., & Panjehbashi-Aghdam, P. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.013 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, W., & Yuan, H.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1252-1260
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046990189
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 24.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.018
- The paper
- Lu, W., & Yuan, H. (2011). A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.