The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benefits, challenges and critical factors of success for Zero Waste: A systematic literature review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
Rennings, K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3 · Cited by 3,226
Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: a review
Mirabella, N., Castellani, V., & Sala, S. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.051 · Cited by 1,166
Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: a meta-analysis
Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029 · Cited by 802
Priefer, C., Jörissen, J., & Bräutigam, K.-R. (2016) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.03.004 · Cited by 434
Addressing food waste reduction in Denmark
Halloran, A., Clement, J., Kornum, N., Bucatariu, C., & Magid, J. (2014) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.09.005 · Cited by 358
Environmental evaluation of municipal waste prevention
Gentil, E. C., Gallo, D., & Christensen, T. H. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.030 · Cited by 172
Parashar, A., Jin, Y., Mason, B., Chae, M., & Bressler, D. C. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-10059 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers
Tura, N., Hanski, J., Ahola, T., Ståhle, M., Piiparinen, S., & Valkokari, P. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202 · Cited by 698
Landfill Impacts on the Environment—Review
Vaverková, M. D. (2019) · Geosciences · doi:10.3390/geosciences9100431 · Cited by 441
Waste problem in European Union and its influence on waste management behaviours
Minelgaitė, A., & Liobikienė, G. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.313 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Pietzsch, N., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & de Medeiros, J. F.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 324-353
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2620443662
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefits, challenges and critical factors of success for Zero Waste: A systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.004
- The paper
- Pietzsch, N., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & de Medeiros, J. F. (2017). Benefits, challenges and critical factors of success for Zero Waste: A systematic literature review. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
