The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental impacts of food waste in Europe
Abstract
Approximately 88 Million tonnes (Mt) of food is wasted in the European Union each year and the environmental impacts of these losses throughout the food supply chain are widely recognised. This study illustrates the impacts of food waste in relation to the total food utilised, including the impact from food waste management based on available data at the European level. The impacts are calculated for the Global Warming Potential, the Acidification Potential and the Eutrophication Potential using a bottom-up approach using more than 134 existing LCA studies on nine representative products (apple, tomato, potato, bread, milk, beef, pork, chicken, white fish). Results show that 186 Mt CO2-eq, 1.7 Mt SO2-eq. and 0.7 Mt PO4-eq can be attributed to food waste in Europe. This is 15 to 16% of the total impact of the entire food supply chain. In general, the study confirmed that most of the environmental impacts are derived from the primary production step of the chain. That is why animal-containing food shows most of the food waste related impacts when it is extrapolated to total food waste even if cereals are higher in mass. Nearly three quarters of all food waste-related impacts for Global Warming originate from greenhouse gas emissions during the production step. Emissions by food processing activities contribute 6%, retail and distribution 7%, food consumption, 8% and food disposal, 6% to food waste related impacts. Even though the results are subject to certain data and scenario uncertainties, the study serves as a baseline assessment, based on current food waste data, and can be expanded as more knowledge on the type and amount of food waste becomes available. Nevertheless, the importance of food waste prevention is underlined by the results of this study, as most of the impacts originate from the production step. Through food waste prevention, those impacts can be avoided as less food needs to be produced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Williams, H., & Wikström, F. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.008 · Cited by 353
Carbon footprint of food waste management options in the waste hierarchy – a Swedish case study
Eriksson, M., Strid, I., & Hansson, P.-A. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.026 · Cited by 304
A framework for modelling indirect land use changes in Life Cycle Assessment
Schmidt, J. H., Weidema, B. P., & Brandão, M. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.013 · Cited by 197
The Role of Household Food Waste in Comparing Environmental Impacts of Packaging Alternatives
Silvenius, F., Grönman, K., Katajajuuri, J.-M., Soukka, R., Koivupuro, H.-K., & Virtanen, Y. (2014) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.2032 · Cited by 115
Cited by
Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy
Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., Ripoll-Bosch, R., Van Zanten, H. H. E., Metze, T. A. P., Termeer, C. J. A. M., van Ittersum, M. K., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2021) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00340-7 · Cited by 403
The battle for biomass: A systematic review of food-feed-fuel competition
Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., de Boer, I. J. M., & Ripoll-Bosch, R. (2020) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100330 · Cited by 398
Nutritional and environmental losses embedded in global food waste
Chen, C., Chaudhary, A., & Mathys, A. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104912 · Cited by 363
Sandberg, H., Alnoor, A., & Tiberius, V. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3259 · Cited by 285
Gaur, V. K., Sharma, P., Sirohi, R., Awasthi, M. K., Dussap, C.-G., & Pandey, A. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123019 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Scherhaufer, S., Moates, G., Hartikainen, H., Waldron, K., & Obersteiner, G.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 98-113
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801680628
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 37.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental impacts of food waste in Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.038
- The paper
- Scherhaufer, S., Moates, G., Hartikainen, H., Waldron, K., & Obersteiner, G. (2018). Environmental impacts of food waste in Europe. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.