Cited by 43Recycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceConstruction Engineering and SafetyBIM and Construction Integration

Factors influencing temporary wood waste generation in high-rise building construction

Kern, Andrea Parisi, Amor, Luciano Vargas, Angulo, Sergio Cirelli, Montelongo, Alfredo·2018·Waste Management

Abstract

In Brazil, the use of wood in construction is primarily temporary, and it can represent a great percentage of construction waste. It is typically discarded with minimal reuse or recycling. As landfill wood disposal could result in methane emissions and/or leaching of hazardous constituents polluting water or soil, the implementation of temporary wood waste reduction strategies must be a critical issue for local construction companies. To manage and control wood waste generation, including setting some reduction goals, it is necessary to identify the influencing factors and ways to quantitatively predict their relative contributions. This study uses a multiple regression statistical model to estimate the amount of temporary wood waste generated in the construction of high-rise buildings by considering the influencing factors related to the design/construction as well as site and safety installations. The case study includes 22 high-rise residential buildings. The regression model predicted approximately 89% of the factors involved in the generation of wood waste in similar constructions. The dependent variables that had an influence on the amount of wood waste are related to design features ('number of floors'), structural construction system ('in situ moulded concrete volume'), and site and safety installations ('site wood fence' and 'wood use rate'). Ways of minimising wood waste generation and the contributions of each type of temporary wood use were discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.057

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Workink together for a world without waste (WRAP), 2012. PAS 111:2012: Specification for the requirements and test methods for processing waste wood. England, pp. 40.

Authors
Kern, A. P., Amor, L. V., Angulo, S. C., & Montelongo, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
78
Pages
446-455
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2810484876
Cited by
43
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Construction Engineering and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
Keywords
high-rise building construction, construction waste generation, wood waste reduction, influencing factors, multiple linear regression, high-rise residential buildings, cast-in-place concrete, methane emissions, waste reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review