Cited by 451Municipal Solid Waste ManagementPolymer crystallization and propertiesWaste Management and Recycling

Technologies for chemical recycling of household plastics – a technical review and TRL assessment

Open access
Solis, Martyna, Silveira, Semida·2020·Waste Management

Abstract

Chemical recycling is considered an attractive technological pathway for reducing waste and greenhouse gas emissions, as well as promoting circular economy. In the EU, readiness to develop a full commercial plant is becoming increasingly important given the ambitious goal to recycle all plastics by 2030. Household packaging streams tend to be of lower quality and lower recycling performance compared to industrial and commercial waste streams, thus requiring particular attention. This paper assesses chemical recycling technologies available and identifies the most suitable for recycling of household plastic waste. We identify eight different technologies and compare them in terms of process temperature, sensitivity to feedstock contamination and level of polymer breakdown, three critical factors affecting the cost and attractiveness of a chemical process. In addition, we carry out a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) assessment for eight technologies based on the stage of their present development. The review is based on peer-reviewed scientific papers and information collected from technology developers and providers, as well as interviews with experts. Our analysis outlines advantages and disadvantages of technologies available for chemical plastic recycling and their TRL. The chemical recycling technologies with the highest TRL are pyrolysis, catalytic cracking and conventional gasification. However, the economic feasibility of these technologies is difficult to assess due to the low number of projects in operation and scarcity of data available for comparison. The results of this analysis provide timely information as policy makers and developers set targets for recycling, and contemplate investments on research and chemical plastic recovering plants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.038

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plastics usually deteriorate and become unusable after undergoing recycling seven times.

    “Solis and Silveira (2020) reported that plastics usually deteriorate and become unusable after undergoing recycling seven times.”

    From Packaging design for the circular economy: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Solis and Silveira (2020)

    The Introduction says that, in the current system, plastic packaging can be recycled up to seven times before its polymers are too degraded for further use. The claim broadens this to plastics generally and turns an upper limit into what usually happens after seven cycles. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The technology readiness level assessment methodology might be used in the future to evaluate municipal, agricultural, and industrial solid waste reuse technologies as data for economic feasibility analysis.

    “The authors concluded that the technology readiness level assessment methodology might be used in the future to evaluate municipal, agricultural, and industrial solid waste reuse technologies as data for economic feasibility analysis.”

    From Recycling municipal, agricultural and industrial waste into energy, fertilizers, food and construction materials, and economic feasibility: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Solis and Silveira 2020

    Section 2 describes a TRL assessment method, and the Introduction links technical maturity to investment decisions. But the Conclusions say the study assessed household plastic recycling technologies, not that its method should later be applied to municipal, agricultural, and industrial solid waste reuse. The Conclusions also say data are currently too limited for a solid economic feasibility analysis. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nine technologies for the chemical recycling of household plastics were analyzed using a technology readiness assessment methodology, ultimately identifying three technologies based on significant research and development centers to explore economies of scale.

    “For instance, Solis and Silveira (2020) have analyzed nine technologies for the chemical recycling of household plastics using a technology readiness assessment methodology, ultimately identifying three technologies based on significant research and development centers to explore economies of scale.”

    From Recycling municipal, agricultural and industrial waste into energy, fertilizers, food and construction materials, and economic feasibility: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Solis and Silveira 2020

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2017. The New Plastics Economy: Catalysing Action. World Economic Forum. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.171. · DOI
  2. European Commission, 2018. A European Strategy for Plastics. European Commission. 10.1021/acs.est.7b02368. Eurostat, 2019. How much plastic packaging waste do we recycle? [WWW Document]. URL https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ DDN-20191105-2 (accessed 12.9.19). Förpacknings och Tidnings Insamlingen (FTI), 2019. Fastighetsnära insamling [WWW Document]. URL https://www.ftiab.se/989.html (accessed 12.9.19). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Plastic Energy, 2019a. Patented Technology [WWW Document]. URL https://plasticenergy.com/technology/#patented-technology (accessed 12.9.19). Plastic Energy, 2019b. Press release: Plastic Energy to build five chemical recycling plants in Indonesia [WWW Document]. URL https://plasticenergy.com/press- release-plastic-energy-to-build-five-chemical-recycling-plants-in-indonesia/ (accessed 12.9.19).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solis, M., & Silveira, S.
Affiliations
  • Profu (Sweden) (SE)
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Solis, Martyna
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
105
Pages
128-138
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005879126
Cited by
451
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 19
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
chemical recycling, household plastic waste, plastic packaging, technology readiness level, pyrolysis, catalytic cracking, gasification, polymer breakdown, circular economy, economic feasibility
MeSH terms
Plastics, Polymers, Technology, Product Packaging, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review