Cited by 38Microplastics and Plastic PollutionMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementSustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis

Seven decades of plastic flows and stocks in the United States and pathways toward zero plastic pollution by 2050

Open access
Kan, Mengqing, Wang, Chunyan, Zhu, Bing, Chen, Wei‐Qiang, Liu, Yi, Ren, Yucheng, Xu, Ming·2023·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

The United States is the world's second‐largest producer and consumer of plastics and the largest producer of plastic waste. Understanding the sources, drivers, and destinations of plastic production, consumption, and waste is critical for the United States to develop strategies toward a zero‐plastic pollution future. Here, we characterize the dynamic material flows and stocks of plastics in the United States for nearly seven decades (1950–2018) and project the future trajectories until 2050 under various scenarios on the basis of reduce, reuse, and recycle to explore pathways toward zero plastic pollution. Our estimation shows that 1479 MMt plastics were produced in the United States from 1950 to 2018, 75 MMt waste plastics were domestically recycled, 139 MMt virgin polymers were exported, and 9 MMt recycled waste plastics were imported. Currently, about 326 MMt of plastics still remain in the society as in‐use stock, most of which (63%) are in the construction sector. Plastic pollution would almost double from 37 MMt in 2018 to 86 MMt in 2050 if current consumption pattern and waste management remain unchanged. Single strategies (i.e., plastic bag ban and extended lifespan) could only contribute limited reductions (2%–12%) of plastics pollution, and would not be able to reverse the increasing trajectory of plastic pollution until 2050. Additional measures are needed, such as improving recycling and avoiding landfilling of plastic waste. Our analysis can provide critical insights to help the United States develop long‐term strategies to mitigate and eliminate plastic pollution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jiec.13427

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • USA, despite advances in recycling technologies, has one of the lowest plastics recycling rates (5%), facing significant challenges in its plastic waste management.

    “Our findings show that USA, despite advances in recycling technologies has one of the lowest plastics recycling rates (5%), facing significant challenges in its plastic waste management 17,35 .”

    From Complexities of the global plastics supply chain revealed in a trade-linked material flow analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [35]

    Section 4.3 describes US plastics recycling rates as relatively low and says further recycling efforts are needed, supporting the waste-management challenge. But Section 3.2 reports a 9.6% recycling rate in 2018, while the paper's 5.7% figure covers cumulative waste from 1950–2018. The cited passages do not establish that the US has one of the world's lowest rates or that recycling technologies have advanced despite that rate. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Chemistry Council. (2009). ACC PIPS Resin Production Sales and Captive Use 1979-2008. Available for purchase through https://www. americanchemistry.com/chemistry-in-america/data-industry-statistics/statistics-on-the-plastic-resins-industry/resin-report-subscriptions American Chemistry Council. (2019). 2019 Resin Review: The Annual Statistical Report of the North American Plastics Industry. https://www. americanchemistry.com/chemistry-in-america/news-trends/press-release/2019/acc-publishes-2019-statistical-reference-book-on-plastic-resins American Chemistry Council. (2020). The Economic Benefits of the US Polyurethanes Industry 2019. https://www.americanchemistry.com/content/ download/6054/file/The-Economic-Benefits-of-the-US-Polyurethanes-Industry-2019.pdf
  2. Kaya, Y. (1989). Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: Interpretation of proposed scenarios (Conference presentation). IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, Paris.
  3. Tehrani, F. B., & Haghi, E. (2015). Techno-economic assessment of municipal solid waste incineration plant-case study of Tehran, Iran. The First Sustainable Development conference of Engineering Systems in Energy, Water and Environment. 21 May, 2015, Tehran, Iran.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kan, M., Wang, C., Zhu, B., Chen, W., Liu, Y., Ren, Y., & Xu, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Ming
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2023-08-24
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1538-1552
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W4386121530
Cited by
38
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (T2261129475, 52070178)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Keywords
plastic pollution, plastic waste, plastic production, plastic consumption, material flow, recycling, plastic bag ban, landfilling, construction industry, plastic waste management, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review