Intraparticle diffusion and adsorption of arsenate onto granular ferric hydroxide (GFH)
Abstract
Porous iron oxides are being evaluated and selected for arsenic removal in potable water systems. Granular ferric hydroxide, a typical porous iron adsorbent, is commercially available and frequently considered in evaluation of arsenic removal methods. GFH is a highly porous (micropore volume approximately 0.0394+/-0.0056 cm(3)g(-1), mesopore volume approximately 0.0995+/-0.0096 cm(3)g(-1)) adsorbent with a BET surface area of 235+/-8 m(2)g(-1). The purpose of this paper is to quantify arsenate adsorption kinetics on GFH and to determine if intraparticle diffusion is a rate-limiting step for arsenic removal in packed-bed treatment systems. Data from bottle-point isotherm and differential column batch reactor (DCBR) experiments were used to estimate Freundlich isotherm parameters (K and 1/n) as well as kinetic parameters describing mass transfer resistances due to film diffusion (k(f)) and intraparticle surface diffusion (D(s)). The pseudo-equilibrium (18 days of contact time) arsenate adsorption density at pH 7 was 8 microg As/mg dry GFH at a liquid phase arsenate concentration of 10 microg As/L. The homogeneous surface diffusion model (HSDM) was used to describe the DCBR data. A non-linear relationship (D(S)=3.0(-9) x R(p)(1.4)) was observed between D(s) and GFH particle radius (R(P)) with D(s) values ranging from 2.98 x 10(-12) cm(2)s(-1) for the smallest GFH mesh size (100 x 140) to 64 x 10(-11) cm(2)s(-1) for the largest GFH mesh size (10 x 30). The rate-limiting process of intraparticle surface diffusion for arsenate adsorption by porous iron oxides appears analogous to organic compound adsorption by activated carbon despite differences in adsorption mechanisms (inner-sphere complexes for As versus hydrophobic interactions for organic contaminants). The findings are discussed in the context of intraparticle surface diffusion affecting packed-bed treatment system design and application of rapid small-scale column tests (RSSCTs) to simulate the performance of pilot- or full-scale systems at the bench-scale.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Various pretreatments like impregnation with Fe, alum, manganese acetate, and posthydrolysis have been explored at lab scale to improve the adsorption efficiency of activated alumina with promising results.
“Various pretreatments like impregnation with Fe [173, 175], alum [176], manganese acetate [177], and posthydrolysis [177] have also been explored at lab scale to improve the adsorption efficiency of AA with promising results.”
From Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: A Review of Sources, Prevalence, Health Risks, and Strategies for Mitigation (2014) · cites this paper as [177]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536 · see citing works
Shankar, S., Shanker, U., & Shikha (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/304524 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
“Ferrihydrite, granular ferric hydroxide, and hydrous ferric oxide are the most widely explored iron oxides and hydroxides for the removal of As yielding promising results for both AsIII and AsV removals [174, 180–184].”
BackgroundIron and aluminium based adsorption strategies for removing arsenic from water
Giles, D. E., Mohapatra, M., Issa, T. B., Anand, S., & Singh, P. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.018 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Liao, W., Zhou, X., Shao, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, S., & Chen, H. (2022) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126273 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Efficient and cost-effective adsorbent brick sand nanoparticles used for removal of heavy metals
Karim, A., Hossain, D., Hossain, I., Dipti, S. S., & Azad, A. K. (2024) · Water Science · doi:10.1080/23570008.2024.2307197 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Badruzzaman, M., Westerhoff, P., & Knappe, D. R. U.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Westerhoff, Paul
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4002-4012
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072331739
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Water Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Arizona State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Keywords
- arsenate adsorption, granular ferric hydroxide, intraparticle diffusion, surface diffusion, adsorption kinetics, arsenic removal, Freundlich isotherm, mass transfer resistance, particle size effects, rapid small-scale column test, drinking water treatment
- MeSH terms
- Adsorption, Arsenates, Diffusion, Ferric Compounds, Herbicides, Water Pollutants, Porosity, Water Purification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review