The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterisation of plastic microbeads in facial scrubs and their estimated emissions in Mainland China
Open accessAbstract
Plastic microbeads are often added to personal care and cosmetic products (PCCPs) as an abrasive agent in exfoliants. These beads have been reported to contaminate the aquatic environment and are sufficiently small to be readily ingested by aquatic organisms. Plastic microbeads can be directly released into the aquatic environment with domestic sewage if no sewage treatment is provided, and they can also escape from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) because of incomplete removal. However, the emissions of microbeads from these two sources have never been estimated for China, and no regulation has been imposed on the use of plastic microbeads in PCCPs. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to estimate the annual microbead emissions in Mainland China from both direct emissions and WWTP emissions. Nine facial scrubs were purchased, and the microbeads in the scrubs were extracted and enumerated. The microbead density in those products ranged from 5219 to 50,391 particles/g, with an average of 20,860 particles/g. Direct emissions arising from the use of facial scrubs were estimated using this average density number, population data, facial scrub usage rate, sewage treatment rate, and a few conservative assumptions. WWTP emissions were calculated by multiplying the annual treated sewage volume and estimated microbead density in treated sewage. We estimated that, on average, 209.7 trillion microbeads (306.9 tonnes) are emitted into the aquatic environment in Mainland China every year. More than 80% of the emissions originate from incomplete removal in WWTPs, and the remaining 20% are derived from direct emissions. Although the weight of the emitted microbeads only accounts for approximately 0.03% of the plastic waste input into the ocean from China, the number of microbeads emitted far exceeds the previous estimate of plastic debris (>330 μm) on the world's sea surface. Immediate actions are required to prevent plastic microbeads from entering the aquatic environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments
Barnes, D. K. A., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., & Barlaz, M. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0205 · Cited by 6,126
Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., & Thiel, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2031505 · Cited by 5,440
Plastic debris in the open ocean
Cózar, A., Echevarría, F., González-Gordillo, J. I., Irigoien, X., Úbeda, B., Hernández-León, S., Palma, Á. T., Navarro, S., García-de-Lomas, J., Ruiz, A., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1314705111 · Cited by 3,133
Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes
Eriksen, M., Mason, S., Wilson, S., Box, C., Zellers, A., Edwards, W., Farley, H., & Amato, S. (2013) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.007 · Cited by 1,937 · cited 4×
“…are generally defined as plastic debris smaller than 5 mm (Arthur et al., 48 2009; Moore, 2008) and have been observed to contami ate various aquatic environments, 49 including fluvial (Klein et al., 2015), lacustrine (Eriksen et al., 2013) and marine (Collignon 50 et al., 2012) environments.”
BackgroundInfluentialKlein, S., Worch, E., & Knepper, T. P. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00492 · Cited by 1,181
Fazey, F. M. C., & Ryan, P. G. (2016) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.026 · Cited by 588
Evidence of microbeads from personal care product contaminating the sea
Cheung, P. K., & Fok, L. (2016) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.046 · Cited by 174
Self-citation
Cited by
Microplastics in cosmetics: Environmental issues and needs for global bans
Guerranti, C., Martellini, T., Perra, G., Scopetani, C., & Cincinelli, A. (2019) · Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.etap.2019.03.007 · Cited by 401
Analysis of microbeads in cosmetic products in the United Arab Emirates
Habib, R. Z., Salim Abdoon, M. M., Al Meqbaali, R. M., Ghebremedhin, F., Elkashlan, M., Kittaneh, W. F., Cherupurakal, N., Mourad, A.-H. I., Thiemann, T., & Al Kindi, R. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113831 · Cited by 109
Biodegradable chito-beads replacing non-biodegradable microplastics for cosmetics
Ju, S., Shin, G., Lee, M., Koo, J. M., Jeon, H., Ok, Y. S., Hwang, D. S., Hwang, S. Y., Oh, D. X., & Park, J. (2021) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d1gc01588e · Cited by 82
Lu, X., Zhang, J.-X., Zhang, L., Wu, D., Tian, J., Yu, L.-J., He, L., Zhong, S., Du, H., Deng, D.-F., et al. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156571 · Cited by 65
Habib, R. Z., Aldhanhani, J. A. K., Ali, A. H., Ghebremedhin, F., Elkashlan, M., Mesfun, M., Kittaneh, W., Al Kindi, R., & Thiemann, T. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-21773-y · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheung, P. K., & Fok, L.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 122
- Pages
- 53-61
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2619963141
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterisation of plastic microbeads in facial scrubs and their estimated emissions in Mainland China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.053
- The paper
- Cheung, P. K., & Fok, L. (2017). Characterisation of plastic microbeads in facial scrubs and their estimated emissions in Mainland China. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.