Cited by 564

The potential implications of reclaimed wastewater reuse for irrigation on the agricultural environment: the knowns and unknowns of the fate of antibiotics and antibiotic resistant bacteria and resistance genes – a review

Christou, Anastasis, Agüera, Ana, Bayona, Josep Maria, Cytryn, Eddie, Fotopoulos, Vasileios, Lambropoulou, Dimitra, Manaia, Célia M., Michael, Costas +3 more·2017·Water Research

Abstract

The use of reclaimed wastewater (RWW) for the irrigation of crops may result in the continuous exposure of the agricultural environment to antibiotics, antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). In recent years, certain evidence indicate that antibiotics and resistance genes may become disseminated in agricultural soils as a result of the amendment with manure and biosolids and irrigation with RWW. Antibiotic residues and other contaminants may undergo sorption/desorption and transformation processes (both biotic and abiotic), and have the potential to affect the soil microbiota. Antibiotics found in the soil pore water (bioavailable fraction) as a result of RWW irrigation may be taken up by crop plants, bioaccumulate within plant tissues and subsequently enter the food webs; potentially resulting in detrimental public health implications. It can be also hypothesized that ARGs can spread among soil and plant-associated bacteria, a fact that may have serious human health implications. The majority of studies dealing with these environmental and social challenges related with the use of RWW for irrigation were conducted under laboratory or using, somehow, controlled conditions. This critical review discusses the state of the art on the fate of antibiotics, ARB and ARGs in agricultural environment where RWW is applied for irrigation. The implications associated with the uptake of antibiotics by plants (uptake mechanisms) and the potential risks t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nonpolar ARGs, microplastics, tire wear particles, and PFAS can be adsorbed quickly because they are hydrophobic and tend to have an affinity towards hydrophobic media pores or to adsorb into amendment compounds.

    “Nonpolar ARGs (Christou et al., 2017), micro­ plastics (Padervand et al., 2020), tire wear particles (Huang et al., 2023), and PFAS (Cai et al., 2022) can be adsorbed quickly as these contami­ nants are hydrophobic and tend to have an affinity towards hydrophobic media pores or to adsorb into amendment compounds.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christou, A., Agüera, A., Bayona, J. M., Cytryn, E., Fotopoulos, V., Lambropoulou, D., Manaia, C. M., Michael, C., Revitt, M., Schröder, P., & Fatta-Kassinos, D.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
123
Pages
448-467
ISSN
0043-1354
Cited by
564
References
1
Language
en
Funders
European Cooperation in Science and Technology (ES1403)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review