Cited by 92Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsWastewater Treatment and Reuse

Field performance of two biofiltration systems treating micropollutants from road runoff

Open access
Flanagan, Kelsey, Branchu, Philippe, Boudahmane, Lila, Caupos, Emilie, Demare, Dominique, Deshayes, Steven, Dubois, Philippe, Meffray, Laurent +3 more·2018·Water Research

Abstract

The treatment efficiency of a vegetative filter strip and a biofiltration swale treating heavily loaded road runoff are evaluated. Concentrations measured in water drained from the two systems are compared to those in untreated road runoff collected from a reference catchment for a wide range of contaminants including organic carbon, nutrients (N and P), trace metals, and organic micropollutants (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), alkylphenols, bisphenol-A, phthalates), in both total and dissolved phases. Predominantly particulate pollutants, including Pb, Zn and PAH, were very efficiently removed (around 90%) for most events. However, poor particulate removal was observed during a winter period. Relatively few pollutants were significantly removed in the dissolved phase and observed concentration reductions tended to be lower than those of suspended solids and associated pollutants; as such, lower removals were observed for total concentrations of moderately particulate micropollutants, including bisphenol-A, alkylphenols and phthalates. In addition, some pollutants appear to be emitted from various biofilter components (filter media, drainage and lining materials), as low or negative concentration removals were observed during the first months of operation of the biofiltration swale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.064

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 92

Authors
Flanagan, K., Branchu, P., Boudahmane, L., Caupos, E., Demare, D., Deshayes, S., Dubois, P., Meffray, L., Partibane, C., Saad, M., & Gromaire, M.-C.
Affiliations
  • École nationale des ponts et chaussées (FR)
  • Centre d'Études et d'Expertise sur les Risques, l'Environnement, la Mobilité et l'Aménagement (FR)
  • Nantes Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Flanagan, Kelsey
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
145
Pages
562-578
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888951958
Cited by
92
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Roulépur research program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
biofiltration, vegetative filter strips, road runoff, micropollutants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, total petroleum hydrocarbons, alkylphenols, bisphenol A, phthalates, trace metals, nutrient removal, particulate matter removal, winter performance, stormwater treatment
MeSH terms
Environmental Pollutants, Petroleum, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Trace Elements, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review