Cited by 407Microplastics and Plastic PollutionPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsUrban Stormwater Management Solutions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microplastics entering northwestern Lake Ontario are diverse and linked to urban sources

Abstract

The sources of microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in freshwater are not well understood. The Greater Toronto Area, Canada's most populous urban area, offers a great study area for understanding the sources and pathways for microplastics to enter freshwater ecosystems. Here, we quantified and characterized microplastics and other anthropogenic particles from Lake Ontario surface waters and source waters (including stormwater runoff, agricultural runoff, and treated wastewater effluent) to better understand sources to the Great Lakes. Anthropogenic particle concentrations in lake samples were 0.8 particles L-1. In source waters, average concentrations were relatively higher in stormwater and wastewater, with 15.4 particles L-1 and 13.3 particles L-1, respectively, compared to 0.9 particles L-1 on average in agricultural runoff. Source waters revealed distinct signatures related to the morphologies of anthropogenic particles, e.g., fibers in wastewater. In addition, many upstream watershed characteristics were found to be significant predictors of anthropogenic particle concentration. Proximity to urban areas were positively correlated to anthropogenic particle concentrations. Future studies should focus on local source-apportionment to inform management and prevent further contamination of microplastics to freshwater ecosystems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115623

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brookson, 2019, Microplastics in the diet of nestling double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auratus), an obligate piscivore, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1
  2. Wolf, 2011, What’s that stuff? Blue jeans, Chem. Eng. News, 89, 44

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–406 of 406

Metadata

Authors
Grbić, J., Helm, P., Athey, S., & Rochman, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (CA)
Corresponding author
Rochman, Chelsea M.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
174
Pages
115623
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006417062
Cited by
407
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 18
FWCI
12.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Keywords
microplastics, anthropogenic particles, Lake Ontario, urban runoff, stormwater, wastewater effluent, agricultural runoff, particle morphology, fibers, source apportionment, catchment characteristics, freshwater pollution, Great Lakes
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Environmental Monitoring, Ontario, Plastics, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Ecosystem, Lakes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review