Cited by 19Fecal contamination and water qualityUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Highly variable removal of pathogens, antibiotic resistance genes, conventional fecal indicators and human-associated fecal source markers in a pilot-scale stormwater biofilter operated under realistic stormflow conditions

Open access

Abstract

Green stormwater infrastructure systems, such as biofilters, provide many water quality and other environmental benefits, but their ability to remove human pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) from stormwater runoff is not well documented. In this study, a field scale biofilter in Southern California (USA) was simultaneously evaluated for the breakthrough of a conservative tracer (bromide), conventional fecal indicators, bacterial and viral human-associated fecal source markers (HF183, crAssphage, and PMMoV), ARGs, and bacterial and viral pathogens. When challenged with a 50:50 mixture of untreated sewage and stormwater (to mimic highly contaminated storm flow) the biofilter significantly removed (p Salmonella (2.3) > adenovirus (1.9) > coliphage (1.5) > crAssphage (1.2) > E. coli (1.0) ∼ 16S rRNA genes (1.0) ∼ fecal coliform (1.0) ∼ intl1 (1.0) > Enterococcus (0.9) ∼ MRSA (0.9) ∼ sul1 (0.9) > PMMoV (0.7) > Entero1A (0.5). No significant removal was observed for GenBac3, Campylobacter, and HF183. From the bromide data, we infer that 0.5 log-units of attenuation can be attributed to the dilution of incoming stormwater with water stored in the biofilter; removal above this threshold is presumably associated with non-conservative processes, such as physicochemical filtration, die-off, and predation. Our study documents high variability (>100-fold) in the removal of different microbial contaminants and ARGs by a field-scale stormwater biofilter operated under transien…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118525

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 101

  1. Afrooz, 2017, Effects of submerged zone, media aging, and antecedent dry period on the performance of biochar-amended biofilters in removing fecal indicators and nutrients from natural stormwater, Ecol. Eng., 102, 320, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.053 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ahmed, 2019, A review on microbial contaminants in stormwater runoff and outfalls: potential health risks and mitigation strategies, Sci. Total Environ., 692, 1304, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.055 · DOI
  3. Ambrose, 2015, Comparison of stormwater bioinfiltration systems in Southeast Australia and Southern California, WIREs Water, 2, 131, 10.1002/wat2.1064 · DOI
  4. Askarizadeh, 2015, From rain tanks to catchments: use of low-impact development to address hydrologic symptoms of the urban stream syndrome, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 11264, 10.1021/acs.est.5b01635 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baker-Austin, 2006, Co-selection of antibiotic and metal resistance, Trends Microbiol., 14, 176, 10.1016/j.tim.2006.02.006 · DOI
  6. Baral, 2018, Tracking the sources of antibiotic resistance genes in an urban stream during wet weather using shot gun metagenomic analyses, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 9033, 10.1021/acs.est.8b01219 · DOI
  7. Berendonk, 2015, Tackling antibiotic resistance: the environmental framework, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 13, 310, 10.1038/nrmicro3439 · DOI
  8. Borthakur, 2022, Natural aging of expanded shale, clay, and slate (ESCS) amendment with heavy metals in stormwater increases its antibacterial properties: Implications on biofilter design, J. Hazard. Mater., 429, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128309 · DOI
  9. Boehm, A.B., Griffith, J., Mcgee, C., Edge, T.A., Whitman, R., Cao, Y., 2009. Faecal indicator bacteria enumeration in beach sand : a comparison study of extraction methods in medium to coarse sands 107, 1740–1750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04440.x. · DOI
  10. Boehm, 2020, Refined ambient water quality thresholds for human-associated fecal indicator HF183 for recreational waters with and without co-occurring gull fecal contamination, Microb. Risk Anal., 16
  11. Boehm, 2015, Human-associated fecal quantitative polymerase chain reaction measurements and simulated risk of gastrointestinal illness in recreational waters contaminated with raw sewage, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 2, 270, 10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00219 · DOI
  12. Bratieres, 2008, Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: a large-scale design optimisation study, Water Res., 42, 3930, 10.1016/j.watres.2008.06.009 · DOI
  13. Bronowski, C., James, C.E., Winstanley, C., 2014. Role of environmental survival in transmission of Campylobacter jejuni. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12488. · DOI
  14. Brown, 2011, Underdrain configuration to enhance bioretention exfiltration to reduce pollutant loads, J. Environ. Eng., 137, 1082, 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000437 · DOI
  15. Byappanahalli, 2012, Enterococci in the environment, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 76, 685, 10.1128/MMBR.00023-12 · DOI
  16. Cao, 2016, The next-generation PCR-based quantification method for ambient waters: digital PCR, Methods Mol. Biol., 1452, 113, 10.1007/978-1-4939-3774-5_7 · DOI
  17. Cao, 2012, Effectiveness of qPCR permutations, internal controls and dilution as means for minimizing the impact of inhibition while measuring Enterococcus in environmental waters, J. Appl. Microbiol., 113, 66, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05305.x · DOI
  18. Chandrasena, 2014, E. coli removal in laboratory scale stormwater biofilters: Influence of vegetation and submerged zone, J. Hydrol., 519, 814, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.015 · DOI
  19. Chandrasena, 2017, Stormwater biofilters as barriers against adenoviruses ; results from a laboratory trial, Water, 9, 10.3390/w9120949 · DOI
  20. Chandrasena, 2016, Biofiltration for stormwater harvesting : comparison of Campylobacter spp . and Escherichia coli removal under normal and challenging operational conditions, J. Hydrol., 537, 248, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.044 · DOI
  21. Chandrasena, 2017, Retention and survival of E. coli in stormwater biofilters: role of vegetation, rhizosphere microorganisms and antimicrobial filter media, Ecol. Eng., 102, 166, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.009 · DOI
  22. Cira, 2021, Commercially available garden products as important sources of antibiotic resistance genes–a survey. Environ, Sci. Poll. Res., 28, 43507, 10.1007/s11356-021-13333-7 · DOI
  23. Clary, 2022, Pathogens in urban stormwater systems: where are we now?, J. Sustain. Water Built Environ., 8, 1, 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000969 · DOI
  24. Colford, 2007, Water quality indicators and the risk of illness at beaches with nonpoint sources of fecal contamination, Epidemiology, 18, 27, 10.1097/01.ede.0000249425.32990.b9 · DOI
  25. Conboy, 2000, Natural protection of groundwater against bacteria of fecal origin, J. Contam. Hydrol., 43
  26. Converse, 2011, Contrasts in concentrations and loads of conventional and alternative indicators of fecal contamination in coastal stormwater, Water Res., 45, 5229, 10.1016/j.watres.2011.07.029 · DOI
  27. Crank, 2019, Quantitative microbial risk assessment of swimming in sewage impacted waters using CrAssphage and pepper mild mottle virus in a customizable model, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 6, 571, 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00468 · DOI
  28. Davis, 2008, Field performance of bioretention: hydrology impacts, J. Hydrol. Eng., 13, 90, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:2(90) · DOI
  29. Davis, 2001, Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management, Water Environ. Res., 73, 5, 10.2175/106143001X138624 · DOI
  30. Dentz, 2011, Mixing, spreading and reaction in heterogeneous media: a brief review, J. Contami. Hydrol., 120-121, 1, 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.05.002 · DOI
  31. Dietz, 2005, A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment, Water Air Soil Pollut., 167, 123, 10.1007/s11270-005-8266-8 · DOI
  32. Field, K.G., Samadpour, M., 2007. Fecal source tracking , the indicator paradigm , and managing water quality 41, 3517–3538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.056. · DOI
  33. Garner, 2017, Stormwater loadings of antibiotic resistance genes in an urban stream, Water Res., 123, 144, 10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.046 · DOI · Paper page
  34. González-Escalona, 2009, Detection of live Salmonella sp. cells in produce by a TaqMan-based quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time PCR targeting invA mRNA, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 75, 3714, 10.1128/AEM.02686-08 · DOI
  35. Goodwin, 2012, A multi-beach study of Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, and enterococci in seawater and beach sand, Water Res., 46, 4195, 10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.001 · DOI
  36. Goodwin, 2009, Performance of CHROMagarTM Staph aureus and CHROMagarTM MRSA for detection of Staphylococcus aureus in seawater and beach sand – Comparison of culture, agglutination, and molecular analyses, Water Res., 43, 4802, 10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.025 · DOI
  37. Graham, 2021, Viral pathogens in urban stormwater runoff: occurrence and removal via vegetated biochar-amended biofilters, Water Res., 207, 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117829 · DOI
  38. Grant, 2013, Adapting urban water systems to a changing climate: lessons from the millennium drought in southeast Australia, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 10727, 10.1021/es400618z · DOI
  39. Grant, 2001, Generation of enterococci bacteria in a coastal saltwater marsh and its impact on surf zone water quality, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 2407, 10.1021/es0018163 · DOI
  40. Grant, 2012, Taking the “waste” out of “wastewater” for human water security and ecosystem sustainability, Science (80- ), 337, 681, 10.1126/science.1216852 · DOI
  41. Green, 2014, Improved HF183 quantitative real-time PCR assay for characterization of human fecal pollution in ambient surface water samples, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 80, 3086, 10.1128/AEM.04137-13 · DOI
  42. Haramoto, E., Kitajima, M., Kishida, N., Konno, Y., Katayama, H., Asami, M., 2013. Occurrence of pepper mild mottle virus in drinking water sources in Japan 79, 7413–7418. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02354-13. · DOI
  43. Harwood, 2014, Microbial source tracking markers for detection of fecal contamination in environmental waters: Relationships between pathogens and human health outcomes, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 38, 1, 10.1111/1574-6976.12031 · DOI
  44. Hathaway, 2011, Field evaluation of bioretention indicator bacteria sequestration in Wilmington, North Carolina, J. Environ. Eng., 137, 1103, 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000444 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Hatt, 2009, Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale, J. Hydrol., 365, 310, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.001 · DOI
  46. Haugland, 2012, Influences of sample interference and interference controls on quantification of enterococci fecal indicator bacteria in surface water samples by the qPCR method, Water Res., 46, 5989, 10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.017 · DOI
  47. He, 2018, Evaluation of attenuation of pharmaceuticals, toxic potency, and antibiotic resistance genes in constructed wetlands treating wastewater effluents, Sci. Total Environ., 631–632, 1572, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.083 · DOI
  48. He, 2020, Antibiotic resistance genes from livestock waste: occurrence, dissemination, and treatment, NPJ Clean Water, 3, 4, 10.1038/s41545-020-0051-0 · DOI
  49. Hrachowitz, 2016, Transit times—the link between hydrology and water quality at the catchment scale, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water, 3, 629, 10.1002/wat2.1155 · DOI
  50. Hung, 2022, Influence of soil characteristics and metal(loid)s on antibiotic resistance genes in green stormwater infrastructure in Southern California, J. Hazard. Mater., 424, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127469 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Hung, 2022, Tracking antibiotic resistance through the environment near a biosolid spreading ground: resistome changes, distribution, and metal(loid) co-selection, Sci. Total Environ., 823, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153570 · DOI
  52. Jothikumar, N., Cromeans, T.L., Hill, V.R., Lu, X., Sobsey, M.D., Erdman, D.D., 2005. Quantitative real-time PCR assays for detection of human adenoviruses and identification of serotypes 40 and 41 71, 3131–3136. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.6.3131. · DOI
  53. Jung, J., Fowdar, H., Henry, R., Deletic, A., Mccarthy, D.T., 2019. Biofilters as effective pathogen barriers for greywater reuse 138, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.07.020. · DOI
  54. Kitajima, 2018, Pepper mild mottle virus as a water quality indicator, NPJ Clean Water, 1, 10.1038/s41545-018-0019-5 · DOI
  55. Kitanidis, 1994, The concept of the dilution index, Water Resour. Res., 30, 2011, 10.1029/94WR00762 · DOI
  56. Knapp, 2010, Evidence of increasing antibiotic resistance gene abundances in archived soils since 1940, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 580, 10.1021/es901221x · DOI
  57. Lamori, 2019, Removal of fecal indicator bacteria and antibiotic resistant genes in constructed wetlands, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 26, 10188, 10.1007/s11356-019-04468-9 · DOI
  58. Lee, 2006, Persistence of fecal indicator bacteria in Santa Monica Bay beach sediments, Water Res., 40, 2593, 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.032 · DOI
  59. Levy, 1987, Bromide as a conservative tracer for soil-water studies, Hydrol. Process, 1, 385, 10.1002/hyp.3360010406 · DOI
  60. Li, 2021, Limited bacterial removal in full-scale stormwater biofilters as evidenced by community sequencing analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 9199, 10.1021/acs.est.1c00510 · DOI
  61. Li, 2012, Removal of Clostridium perfringens , Escherichia coli and F-RNA coliphages by stormwater biofilters, Ecol. Eng., 49, 137, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.08.007 · DOI
  62. Li, 2014, Removal of E. coli from urban stormwater using antimicrobial-modified filter media, J. Hazard. Mater., 271, 73, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.057 · DOI
  63. Li, 2016, Escherichia coli removal in copper-zeolite-integrated stormwater biofilters: effect of vegetation, operational time, intermittent drying weather, Ecol. Eng., 90, 234, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.066 · DOI
  64. Luo, 2010, Trends in antibiotic resistance genes occurrence in the Haihe River, China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 7220, 10.1021/es100233w · DOI
  65. Mohanty, 2014, Efficacy of biochar to remove Escherichia coli from stormwater under steady and intermittent flow, Water Res., 61, 288, 10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.026 · DOI
  66. Mohanty, 2015, Effect of weathering on mobilization of biochar particles and bacterial removal in a stormwater biofilter, Water Res., 85, 208, 10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.026 · DOI
  67. Mohanty, 2014, Escherichia coli removal in biochar-augmented biofilter: effect of infiltration rate, initial bacterial concentration, biochar particle size, and presence of compost, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 11535, 10.1021/es5033162 · DOI
  68. Mohanty, 2013, Engineering solutions to improve the removal of fecal indicator bacteria by bioinfiltration systems during intermittent flow of stormwater, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 10791, 10.1021/es305136b · DOI
  69. Murphy, 2006, Environmental survival mechanisms of the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni, J. Appl. Microbiol., 100, 623, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02903.x · DOI
  70. Nshimyimana, 2014, Distribution and abundance of human-specific Bacteroides and relation to traditional indicators in an urban tropical catchment, J. Appl. Microbiol., 116, 1369, 10.1111/jam.12455 · DOI
  71. Pan, 2018, Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in soils from wastewater irrigation areas in the Pearl River Delta region, southern China, Sci. Total Environ., 624, 145, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.008 · DOI
  72. Parker, 2022, Can smart stormwater systems outsmart the weather? Stormwater capture with real-time control in Southern California, ACS ES&T Water, 2, 10, 10.1021/acsestwater.1c00173 · DOI
  73. Parker, 2021, Predicting solute transport through green stormwater infrastructure with unsteady transit time distribution theory, Water Resour. Res., 1
  74. Parker, 2017, Predictive power of clean bed filtration theory for fecal indicator bacteria removal in stormwater biofilters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5703, 10.1021/acs.est.7b00752 · DOI
  75. Passerat, 2010, Impact of an intense combined sewer overflow event on the microbiological water quality of the Seine River, Water Res., 45, 893, 10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.024 · DOI
  76. Pei, 2006, Effect of River Landscape on the sediment concentrations of antibiotics and corresponding antibiotic resistance genes (ARG), Water Res., 40, 2427, 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.017 · DOI
  77. Peng, 2016, Indicator and pathogen removal by low impact development best management practices, Water, 1
  78. Penrod, 1996, Deposition kinetics of two viruses in packed beds of quartz granular media, Langmuir, 12, 5576, 10.1021/la950884d · DOI
  79. Petterson, 2016, Evaluation of three full-scale stormwater treatment systems with respect to water yield, pathogen removal efficacy and human health risk from faecal pathogens, Sci. Total Environ., 543, 691, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.056 · DOI
  80. Redman, 1997, Filtration of recombinant norwalk virus particles and bacteriophage MS2 in quartz sand: importance of electrostatic interactions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 3378, 10.1021/es961071u · DOI
  81. Rippy, 2015, Meeting the criteria: linking biofilter design to fecal indicator bacteria removal, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water, 2, 577, 10.1002/wat2.1096 · DOI
  82. Rodrigues, C., 2017. Assessment of the microbiological quality of recreational waters : indicators and methods. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-017-0035-8. · DOI
  83. Rosario, 2009, Pepper mild mottle virus as an indicator of fecal pollution, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 75, 7261, 10.1128/AEM.00410-09 · DOI
  84. Ryan, J.N., Elimelech, M., Ard, R.A., Harvey, R.W., Johnson, P.R., 1999. Bacteriophage PRD1 and silica colloid transport and recovery in an iron oxide-coated sand aquifer 33, 63–73. · DOI
  85. Sassoubre, 2012, Comparison of enterovirus and adenovirus concentration and enumeration methods in seawater from Southern Lauren M . Sassoubre , David C . Love , Andrea I . Silverman , Kara L, Nelson, 419
  86. Savichtcheva, 2006, Alternative indicators of fecal pollution: relations with pathogens and conventional indicators, current methodologies for direct pathogen monitoring and future application perspectives, Water Res., 40, 2463, 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.040 · DOI
  87. Schoen, 2020, Contamination scenario matters when using viral and bacterial human-associated genetic markers as indicators of a health risk in untreated sewage-impacted recreational waters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 13101, 10.1021/acs.est.0c02189 · DOI
  88. Selvakumar, 2006, Variation of microorganism concentrations in urban stormwater runoff with land use and seasons, J. Water Health, 04, 109, 10.2166/wh.2006.0009 · DOI
  89. Sercu, 2009, Storm drains are sources of human fecal pollution during dry weather in three urban Southern California watersheds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 293, 10.1021/es801505p · DOI
  90. Sercu, 2011, Sewage exfiltration as a source of storm drain contamination during dry weather in urban watersheds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 7151, 10.1021/es200981k · DOI
  91. Soller, 2010, Estimated human health risks from exposure to recreational waters impacted by human and non-human sources of faecal contamination, Water Res., 44, 4674, 10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.049 · DOI
  92. Stachler, E., Kelty, C., Sivaganesan, M., Li, X., Bibby, K., Shanks, O.C., 2017. Quantitative CrAssphage PCR assays for human fecal pollution measurement. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02703. · DOI
  93. Stachler, 2019, Co-occurrence of crAssphage with antibiotic resistance genes in an impacted urban watershed, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 6, 216, 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00130 · DOI
  94. Stalder, 2012, Integron involvement in environmental spread of antibiotic resistance, Front. Microbiol., 3, 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00119 · DOI
  95. Surbeck, 2006, Flow fingerprinting fecal pollution and suspended solids in stormwater runoff from an urban coastal watershed, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4435, 10.1021/es060701h · DOI
  96. Symonds, 2014, ScienceDirect A case study of enteric virus removal and insights into the associated risk of water reuse for two wastewater treatment pond systems in Bolivia, Water Res., 65, 257, 10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.032 · DOI
  97. Vikesland, 2017, Toward a comprehensive strategy to mitigate dissemination of environmental sources of antibiotic resistance, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 13061, 10.1021/acs.est.7b03623 · DOI
  98. Wang, 2016, A comprehensive analysis on spread and distribution characteristic of antibiotic resistance genes in livestock farms of Southeastern China, PLOS One, 11
  99. Wolfand, 2018, Multiple pathways to bacterial load reduction by stormwater best management practices: trade-offs in performance, Volume, and Treated Area, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 6370, 10.1021/acs.est.8b00408 · DOI
  100. Youngblood, S., 2017. Field studies of microbial removal from stormwater by bioretention cells with fly-ash amendment 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9070526. · DOI
  101. Zhang, 2016, Antibiotic concentration and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in two shallow urban lakes after stormwater event. Environ, Sci. Pollut. Res., 23, 9984, 10.1007/s11356-016-6237-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rugh, M. B., Grant, S. B., Hung, W.-C., Jay, J. A., Parker, E. A., Feraud, M., Li, D., Avasarala, S., Holden, P. A., Liu, H., Rippy, M. A., Werfhorst, L. C. V. D., Kefela, T., Peng, J., Shao, S., Graham, K. E., Boehm, A. B., Choi, S., Mohanty, S. K., & Cao, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Center for Coastal Studies (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • GSI Environmental (United States) (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Cao, Yiping
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
219
Pages
118525
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225279720
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Water Research (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of the President, University of California (2021015)
  • National Science Foundation (0963183, EEC-1028968)
  • University of California Irvine (MRP-17\u2013455083)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
pathogen removal, antibiotic resistance genes, fecal indicator bacteria, viral pathogens, crAssphage, pepper mild mottle virus, HF183, bromide tracer, wastewater pollution, green stormwater infrastructure, ermB, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, sul1, Enterococcus, Salmonella, adenovirus, fecal coliforms
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bromides, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Escherichia coli, Feces, Humans, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Water Microbiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review