Cited by 12Travel-related health issuesFecal contamination and water qualityFood Safety and Hygiene

An assessment of diarrhea among long-distance backpackers in the Sierra Nevada

Meyer, Derek J., Costantino, Amber, Spano, Susanne·2017·Wilderness & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diarrhea is a common problem among long-distance backpackers, ranging in overall incidence from 11-56% as reported by previous studies on the Appalachian Trail and Long Trail. Differences in age, sex, and regularity of standard backcountry hygiene recommendations and practices have been shown to significantly affect the incidence of diarrhea. No study to date has investigated these trends among long-distance backpackers on the John Muir Trail (JMT) in the Sierra Nevada mountain range of California. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of online survey data gathered from long-distance backpackers who attempted a JMT trek in 2014. Data were assessed for the significance of variables that might contribute to the incidence and severity of on-trail diarrhea. RESULTS: Of 737 valid responders, 16.4% reported experiencing diarrhea (82% with minimal/mild severity; 18% with significant severity). Regular hand sanitizer use was significantly correlated with more severe diarrhea (P < .05), but had no effect on incidence. Regular hand sanitizer users followed all other recommended hygiene practices as frequently as or better than those not using hand sanitizer regularly. Of all backpackers, 88% filtered or treated their drinking water regularly, with 18% of those reporting diarrhea of any severity. CONCLUSIONS: JMT backpackers have a comparatively lower incidence of diarrhea than backpackers on other major long-distance backpacking routes in the United States. Most JMT backpackers follow standard backcountry hygiene recommendations, including regular filtration or treatment of drinking water. No statistical significance was found between the incidence of diarrhea and compliance with standard hygiene recommendations. Regular hand sanitizer use was significantly correlated with more severe diarrhea but was not associated with incidence. There was no significant difference in compliance with standard backcountry hygiene practices between regular and infrequent hand sanitizer users.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wem.2016.12.002

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer, D. J., Costantino, A., & Spano, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • California State University–Fresno, Fresno, CA (Ms Constantino)
Corresponding author
Meyer, Derek J.
Venue
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Published
2017-03
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
4-9
ISSN
  • 1080-6032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1534
OpenAlex
W2508434369
Cited by
12
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wilderness and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
Keywords
diarrhea, John Muir Trail, Sierra Nevada, hand sanitizer, drinking water filtration, water treatment, hygiene compliance
MeSH terms
Adult, California, Diarrhea, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Hygiene, Male, Middle Aged, Mountaineering, Retrospective Studies, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review