CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 178Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health care interventions for intimate partner violence: What women want

Chang, Judy C., Cluss, Patricia A., Ranieri, LeeAnn, Hawker, Lynn, Buranosky, Raquel, Dado, Diane, McNeil, Melissa, Scholle, Sarah H.·2005·Women's Health Issues
DOI 10.1016/j.whi.2004.08.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective We sought to determine what women want from health care interventions for intimate partner violence (IPV) and understand why they found certain interventions useful or not useful.Methods We conducted interviews with 21 women who have a past or current history of intimate partner violence. Participants were given cards describing various IPV interventions and asked to perform a pile sort by placing cards into three categories ("definitely yes," "maybe," and "definitely no") indicating whether they would want that resource available. They were then asked to explain their categorizations.Results The pile sort identified that the majority of participants supported informational interventions and individual counseling. Only 9 of 17, however, felt couple's counseling was a good idea with seven reporting it was definitely not useful. Half wanted help with substance use and treatment for depression. Interventions not well regarded included "Receiving a follow-up telephone call from the doctor's office/clinic" and "Go stay at shelter" with only 7 and 5 of the 21 women placing these cards in the "definitely yes" pile. "Health provider reporting to police" was the intervention most often placed in the "definitely no" pile, with 9 of 19 women doing so. The women described several elements that affected their likelihood of using particular IPV interventions. One theme related stages of "readiness" for change. Another theme dealt with the complexity of many women's lives. Interventions that could accommodate various stages of "readiness" and helped address concomitant issues were deemed more useful. Characteristics of such interventions included: 1) not requiring disclosure or identification as IPV victims, 2) presenting multiple options, and 3) preserving respect for autonomy.Conclusions Women who had experienced IPV described not only what they wanted from IPV interventions but how they wished to receive these services and why they would chose to use certain resources. They advised providing a variety of options to allow individualizing according to different needs and readiness to seek help. They emphasized interventions that protected safety, privacy, and autonomy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.whi.2004.08.007

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Gerbert, 2000, Interventions that help victims of domestic violence, Journal of Family Practice, 49, 889
  2. Landenburger, 1993, Exploration of women’s identity, AWHONNS Clinical Issues in Perinatal Womens Health Nursing, 4, 378
  3. McNutt, 1999, Reproductive violence screening in primary care, Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 54, 85
  4. Sofaer, 1999, Qualitative methods, Health Services Research, 34, 1110
  5. Weller, 1988, vol. 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 178

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chang, J. C., Cluss, P. A., Ranieri, L., Hawker, L., Buranosky, R., Dado, D., McNeil, M., & Scholle, S. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Sewickley Valley Hospital (US)
  • Magee-Womens Hospital (US)
  • National Committee for Quality Assurance (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Judy C.
ORCID
Venue
Women's Health Issues
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
21-30
ISSN
1049-3867 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.whi.2004.08.007
OpenAlex
W2001324217
Cited by
178
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Women s Health Issues (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
intimate partner violence, health interventions, women's preferences, information interventions, individual counseling, addiction treatment, depression treatment, readiness to change, autonomy, privacy, help-seeking
MeSH terms
Adult, Counseling, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Spouse Abuse, United States, Women's Health, Battered Women, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review