CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use and Risk Perception of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Tobacco in Pregnancy

Bhandari, Naleen Raj, Day, Kanesha D., Payakachat, Nalin, Franks, Amy M., McCain, Keith R., Ragland, Denise·2018·Women's Health Issues
DOI 10.1016/j.whi.2018.02.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction Given the rapid rise in availability and use, understanding the perception of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) products in pregnant women is vital. As more women of reproductive age use these products, it is likely that their use during pregnancy is also increasing. This study investigated the use of ENDS and tobacco cigarettes, along with knowledge and perceptions of associated health risks in pregnant women. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted at a university-based obstetrical clinic. A 32-item self-administered survey was used to collect participants' knowledge, use, and risk perceptions of ENDS and tobacco smoking. Bivariate associations of demographics and ENDS user status were explored using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Average differences in agreement with perception statements across ENDS user status were tested using ANOVA with Tukey's tests for multiple comparisons. Results Of 382 participants, 57.9% were 21-29 years old and 60.1% had some college or higher education. 30.3% reported using both ENDS and tobacco cigarettes and 11.9% were current ENDS users. The majority of participants had adequate knowledge about the facts and safety of ENDS and there was no difference across three ENDS user status groups. ENDS users perceived significantly lower risk of ENDS and higher benefit of using ENDS to aid quitting tobacco smoking, compared to non-ENDS users. The majority of participants reported that their healthcare providers less…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.whi.2018.02.005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Adkison, 2013, Electronic nicotine delivery systems: International tobacco control four-country survey, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44, 207, 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.018 · DOI
  2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2010, Smoking cessation during pregnancy. Committee Opinion No. 471, Obstetrics & Gynecologu, 116, 1241, 10.1097/00006250-201011000-00054 · DOI
  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2011, Tobacco use and women’s health. Committee Opinion No. 503, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 118, 746, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182310ca9 · DOI
  4. Chivers, 2016, E-cigarette use among women of reproductive age: Impulsivity, cigarette smoking status, and other risk factors, Preventive Medicine, 92, 126, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.029 · DOI
  5. Dutra, 2014, High international electronic cigarette use among never smoker adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 595, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.08.010 · DOI
  6. England, 2014, Screening practices and attitudes of obstetricians-gynecologists toward new and emerging tobacco products, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 211, 695.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.041 · DOI
  7. Ferrer, 2015, Risk perceptions and health behavior, Current Opinion in Psychology, 5, 85, 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Heeren, 1987, Robustness of the two independent samplest-test when applied to ordinal scaled data, Statistics in Medicine, 6, 79, 10.1002/sim.4780060110 · DOI
  9. Kahr, 2015, A qualitative assessment of the perceived risks of electronic cigarette and hookah use in pregnancy, BMC Public Health, 15, 1273, 10.1186/s12889-015-2586-4 · DOI
  10. Lam, 2015, Are electronic nicotine delivery systems an effective smoking cessation tool?, Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy, 51, 93
  11. Mark, 2015, Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of electronic cigarette use among pregnant women, Journal of Addiction Medicine, 9, 266, 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000128 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Smith, 2016, E-cigarettes: How “safe” are they? Without tobacco, tar, ash, or carbon monoxide, e-cigarettes are marketed as “healthier” alternatives to cigarettes. But they are not without risk, Journal of Family Practice, 65, 380
  13. Stiger, 1998, Anova for repeated ordinal data with small sample size? A comparison of anova, manova, wls and gee methods by simulation, Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 27, 357, 10.1080/03610919808813485 · DOI
  14. Sullivan, 2003, Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials, Statistics in Medicine, 22, 1317, 10.1002/sim.1433 · DOI
  15. Suter, 2013, Maternal smoking as a model for environmental epigenetic changes affecting birthweight and fetal programming, Molecular Human Reproduction, 19, 1, 10.1093/molehr/gas050 · DOI
  16. Suter, 2015, Is there evidence for potential harm of electronic cigarette use in pregnancy?, Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 103, 186, 10.1002/bdra.23333 · DOI
  17. Wigginton, 2017, Is it safe to vape? Analyzing online forums discussing e-cigarette use during pregnancy, Women’s Health Issues, 27, 93, 10.1016/j.whi.2016.09.008 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 50

Metadata

Authors
Bhandari, N. R., Day, K. D., Payakachat, N., Franks, A. M., McCain, K. R., & Ragland, D.
ORCID
McCain, Keith R.
Venue
Women's Health Issues
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
251-257
ISSN
1049-3867
DOI
10.1016/j.whi.2018.02.005
Cited by
50
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use and Risk Perception of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Tobacco in Pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.whi.2018.02.005
The paper
Bhandari, N. R., Day, K. D., Payakachat, N., Franks, A. M., McCain, K. R., & Ragland, D. (2018). Use and Risk Perception of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Tobacco in Pregnancy. Women's Health Issues. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.02.005