The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine Learning and Neurosurgical Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Objective Accurate measurement of surgical outcomes is highly desirable to optimize surgical decision-making. An important element of surgical decision making is identification of the patient cohort that will benefit from surgery before the intervention. Machine learning (ML) enables computers to learn from previous data to make accurate predictions on new data. In this systematic review, we evaluate the potential of ML for neurosurgical outcome prediction.Methods A systematic search in the PubMed and Embase databases was performed to identify all potential relevant studies up to January 1, 2017.Results Thirty studies were identified that evaluated ML algorithms used as prediction models for survival, recurrence, symptom improvement, and adverse events in patients undergoing surgery for epilepsy, brain tumor, spinal lesions, neurovascular disease, movement disorders, traumatic brain injury, and hydrocephalus. Depending on the specific prediction task evaluated and the type of input features included, ML models predicted outcomes after neurosurgery with a median accuracy and area under the receiver operating curve of 94.5% and 0.83, respectively. Compared with logistic regression, ML models performed significantly better and showed a median absolute improvement in accuracy and area under the receiver operating curve of 15% and 0.06, respectively. Some studies also demonstrated a better performance in ML models compared with established prognostic indices and clinical experts.Conclusions In the research setting, ML has been studied extensively, demonstrating an excellent performance in outcome prediction for a wide range of neurosurgical conditions. However, future studies should investigate how ML can be implemented as a practical tool supporting neurosurgical care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ML tools for optimizing care outcomes have been used in various settings, including critical care for optimizing sepsis management (27), management of chronic conditions (28), and optimizing surgical outcomes (29).”
From Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author)
Breiman, L. (2001) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009213726 · Cited by 4,340
Predicting the future - big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine
Obermeyer, Z., & Emanuel, E. J. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1606181 · Cited by 3,652
Deo, R. C. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.001593 · Cited by 3,466
Machine Learning Applications in Cancer Prognosis and Prediction
Kourou, K., Exarchos, T. P., Exarchos, K. P., Karamouzis, M. V., & Fotiadis, D. I. (2015) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2014.11.005 · Cited by 3,338
Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence
Ghahramani, Z. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14541 · Cited by 1,995
Applications of Machine Learning in Cancer Prediction and Prognosis
Cruz, J. A., & Wishart, D. S. (2006) · Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1177/117693510600200030 · Cited by 1,371
Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.
Cruz, J. A., & Wishart, D. S. (2007) · PubMed Central · Cited by 879
Natural and Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review
Senders, J. T., Arnaout, O. M., Karhade, A. V., Dasenbrock, H. H., Gormley, W. B., Broekman, M. L. D., & Smith, T. R. (2017) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx384 · Cited by 271
Self-citationMachine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician's Perspective
Kang, J., Schwartz, R. S., Flíckinger, J. C., & Beriwal, S. (2015) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2286 · Cited by 227
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 484
Singh, A., Velagala, V. R., Kumar, T., Dutta, R. R., & Sontakke, T. R. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.42460 · Cited by 15
“Compared to the traditional logistic regression model, DL models show a raw improvement in median accuracy by 15% [51].”
BackgroundMethodInformation-Based Medicine in Glioma Patients: A Clinical Perspective
Senders, J. T., Harary, M., Stopa, B. M., Staples, P. C., Broekman, M. L. D., Smith, T. R., Gormley, W. B., & Arnaout, O. M. (2018) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2018/8572058 · Cited by 12
Self-citationPennington, Z. A., Pielkenrood, B. J., Ahmed, A. K., Goodwin, C. R., Verlaan, J., & Sciubba, D. M. (2019) · Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication · doi:10.1097/bsd.0000000000000784 · Cited by 12
Muhlestein, W. E., Monsour, M. A., Friedman, G. N., Zinzuwadia, A. N., Zachariah, M. A., Coumans, J.-V. C. E., Carter, B. S., & Chambless, L. B. (2020) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa585 · Cited by 12
Predicting outcomes following lower extremity open revascularization using machine learning
Li, B., Verma, R., Beaton, D., Tamim, H., Hussain, M. A., Hoballah, J. J., Lee, D. S., Wijeysundera, D. N., de Mestral, C., Mamdani, M., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52944-1 · Cited by 11
“These were chosen because they demonstrate the best performance for predicting surgical outcomes in the literature 26–28 .”
Sharda, M., Sharma, S., Raikar, S. P., Verhagen, N. B., Wagle, J., Mathur, R., Gowda, S., Kommu, S., Prasad, R., Bhandari, S., et al. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.84761 · Cited by 11
Liang, H., Yang, L., Tao, L., Shi, L., Yang, W., Bai, J., Zheng, D., Wang, N., & Ji, J. (2020) · Chinese Journal of Cancer Research · doi:10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.02.11 · Cited by 11
Ensemble machine learning for the prediction of patient-level outcomes following thyroidectomy
Seib, C. D., Roose, J. P., Hubbard, A., & Suh, I. (2020) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.055 · Cited by 11
Pepa, G. M. D., Caccavella, V. M., Menna, G., Ius, T., Auricchio, A., Chiesa, S., Gaudino, S., Marchese, E., & Olivi, A. (2021) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.082 · Cited by 11
Koyama, H., Mori, A., Nagatomi, D., Fujita, T., Saito, K., Osaki, Y., Yamasoba, T., & Doi, K. (2021) · Otology & Neurotology · doi:10.1097/mao.0000000000003271 · Cited by 11
Kim, S. H., Lee, S. H., & Shin, D. A. (2022) · Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication · doi:10.1097/bsd.0000000000001295 · Cited by 11
Unadkat, V., Pangal, D. J., Kugener, G., Roshannai, A., Chan, J., Zhu, Y., Markarian, N., Zada, G., & Donoho, D. A. (2022) · Neurosurgical FOCUS · doi:10.3171/2022.1.focus21652 · Cited by 11
Alshahrani, S. M., Almutairy, B. K., Alfadhel, M. M., Belal, A., Abourehab, M. A. S., Saqr, A. A., Alshetaili, A., Venkatesan, K., Alsubaiyel, A. M., & Pishnamazi, M. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21233-0 · Cited by 11
Künstliche Intelligenz in der Neurochirurgie
Bonsanto, M. M., & Tronnier, V. M. (2020) · Der Chirurg · doi:10.1007/s00104-020-01131-9 · Cited by 11
Schiavolin, S., Raggi, A., Scaratti, C., Toppo, C., Silvaggi, F., Sattin, D., Broggi, M. A., Ferroli, P., & Leonardi, M. (2020) · Neurosurgical Review · doi:10.1007/s10143-020-01289-0 · Cited by 11
PassFlow: a multimodal workflow for predicting deep brain stimulation outcomes
Peralta, M., Haegelen, C., Jannin, P., & Baxter, J. S. H. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-021-02435-9 · Cited by 12
On the Use of Machine Learning for Classifying Auditory Brainstem Responses: A Scoping Review
Osman, R. A., & Osman, H. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3102096 · Cited by 13
“Machine learning (ML) is a type of AI that makes a prediction or decision by learning patterns in training data and not through direct programming [23].”
BackgroundLi, B., Shaikh, F., Zamzam, A., Syed, M. H., Abdin, R., & Qadura, M. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13123583 · Cited by 12
“This algorithm was chosen because of its widespread use in the literature and its demonstrated high performance in predicting health outcomes [40–42].”
MethodUsing Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes Following Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting
Li, B., Eisenberg, N., Beaton, D., Lee, D. S., Al‐Omran, L., Wijeysundera, D. N., Hussain, M. A., Rotstein, O. D., de Mestral, C., Mamdani, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.124.035425 · Cited by 11
“26–28 Logistic regression was the baseline comparator because it is the most commonly applied statistical model in traditional risk prediction tools.”
Yang, L., Yang, M., Chen, L., Shen, Y.-L., He, Y. M., Meng, Z.-T., Wang, W., Feng, L., Liu, Z., Li, L., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1457294 · Cited by 10
Predicting lack of clinical improvement following varicose vein ablation using machine learning
Li, B., Eisenberg, N., Beaton, D., Lee, D. S., Al‐Omran, L., Wijeysundera, D. N., Hussain, M. A., Rotstein, O. D., de Mestral, C., Mamdani, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102162 · Cited by 13
Maroufi, S. F., Pachón-Londoño, M. J., Ghoche, M. T., Nguyen, B. A., Turcotte, E. L., Wang, Z., Patra, D. P., Olson, V. A., Halpin, B. S., Bathini, A. R., et al. (2025) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000003531 · Cited by 12
AI applications in prevalent diseases and disorders
Catania, L. J. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-824477-7.00007-9 · Cited by 11
Song, J., Shin, S. D., Jamaluddin, S. F., Chiang, W., Tanaka, H., Song, K. J., Ahn, S., Park, J.-H., Kim, J. Y., Cho, H., et al. (2023) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2022.0280 · Cited by 10
“21 In this study, the ML techniques outper-formed several conventional predictive tools.”
Machine learning application in otology
Koyama, H. (2024) · Auris Nasus Larynx · doi:10.1016/j.anl.2024.04.003 · Cited by 12
Prince, R. D., Akhondi‐Asl, A., Mehta, N. M., & Geva, A. (2021) · Critical Care Explorations · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000000426 · Cited by 10
“The PELOD score was updated to PELOD-2 to include mean arterial pressure (MAP) and lactatemia, which are also variably present in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (7), pediatric SOFA (8), and Pediatric MODS scores (9), and hepatic dysfunction was removed (1).”
MethodBuchlak, Q. D., Esmaili, N., Bennett, C. C., Wang, Y. Y., King, J. A. J., & Goldschlager, T. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272147 · Cited by 10
Comparative Analysis of Legal Outcome Prediction with Detailed and Summarized Text
Varshini, S. H., Varma, G. S., Prabhakar, P., & Pati, P. B. (2024) · IEEE International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) · doi:10.1109/i2ct61223.2024.10544203 · Cited by 9
“Machine learning and deep learning models are used for outcome prediction in various domains such as medical systems, face recognition systems etc [3].”
BackgroundPatel, T. D., Ibrahim, H. Y., Henna, F., Nasir, F., Hussain, A., Naveed, R., Rehman, A. U., Kazmi, S. R. Z., Patel, B. D., Anand, N., et al. (2025) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1097/ms9.0000000000004246 · Cited by 9
“Machine learning has demonstrated strong performance in predicting tumor recurrence and functional recovery following surgery, offering valuable insights for rehabilitation planning [ 32 ] .”
Factors affecting the performance of brain arteriovenous malformation rupture prediction models
Tao, W., Yan, L., Zeng, M. H., & Chen, F. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01511-z · Cited by 9
“Of these machine learning algorithms, the RF algorithm is considered most promising because of its better performance, especially for big data [24].”
BackgroundA Deep Neural Network-Based Model Predicting Peritumoral Edema After Radiosurgery for Meningioma
Kim, K. H., Jung, S., Lee, H.-J., Kwon, H., Choi, S.-W., Koh, H., Youm, J.-Y., & Kim, S. (2022) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.125 · Cited by 9
Schonfeld, E., Mordekai, N., Berg, A., Johnstone, T. M., Shah, A., Shah, V. B., Haider, G., Marianayagam, N. J., & Veeravagu, A. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.51963 · Cited by 9
“In the case of outcome prediction, there has been an average accuracy of 0.945 and an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83, spanning across predictions for functional, spine, neurovascular, brain tumor, and traumatic subdomains [1].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKline, A. S., Kline, T. J. B., Abad, Z. S. H., & Lee, J. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20268 · Cited by 11
“Some reviews have supported the contention that ML algorithms should outperform human experts [19], but others have found that overly complex approaches used in some ML models are no better than simpler, more intuitive models [20].”
BackgroundGarcia‐Cairasco, N., Gondim, G. G. P., & Tejada, J. (2021) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107930 · Cited by 9
Elahi, C., Adil, S. M., Sakita, F. M., Mmbaga, B. T., Rocha, T. A. H., Fuller, A. T., Haglund, M. M., Vissoci, J. R. N., & Staton, C. A. (2021) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2020.7483 · Cited by 11
“All patients presenting to KCMC emergency room with a TBI are enrolled in the registry (Glasgow Coma Score [GCS] 3–15).”
Predictive Analytics in Clinical Practice: Advantages and Disadvantages
Mijderwijk, H.-J., & Steiger, H. (2021) · Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85292-4_30 · Cited by 9
Machine Learning–Based Mortality Prediction of Patients at Risk During Hospital Admission
Trentino, K. M., Schwarzbauer, K., Mitterecker, A., Hofmann, A., Lloyd, A., Leahy, M. F., Tschoellitsch, T., Böck, C., Hochreiter, S., & Meier, J. (2022) · Journal of Patient Safety · doi:10.1097/pts.0000000000000957 · Cited by 9
Jing, X., Wang, X., Zhuang, H., Fang, X., & Xu, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Surgery · doi:10.3389/fsurg.2021.797872 · Cited by 8
Otieno, J. A., Häggström, J., Darehed, D., & Eriksson, M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0303287 · Cited by 10
Guo, Q., Xie, M., Wang, X., Han, C., Gao, G., Wang, Q., Li, J., Duan, L., & Bao, X. (2025) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-025-03446-y · Cited by 9
“The number of decision trees is adjusted to minimize the error rate as much as possible and prevent the model from overfitting the training data [60, 61].”
Roy, J. M., Atallah, E., Piper, K. J., Majmundar, S., Mouchtouris, N., Self, D. M., Kaul, A., Sizdahkhani, S., Musmar, B., Tjoumakaris, S. I., et al. (2025) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108986 · Cited by 9
Greenberg, J. K., Otun, A., Ghogawala, Z., Yen, P., Molina, C. A., Limbrick, D. D., Foraker, R. E., Kelly, M. P., & Ray, W. Z. (2021) · Global Spine Journal · doi:10.1177/21925682211008424 · Cited by 10
“83-86 Consequently, investigations using machine learning for clinical predictions should demonstrate sufficient improvements in predictive performance to justify the loss of interpretability.”
BackgroundCao, X., Lin, Y., Yang, B., Li, Y., & Zhou, J. (2022) · Risk Management and Healthcare Policy · doi:10.2147/rmhp.s346856 · Cited by 8
Guiñazú, M. F., González, M., Ruiz, R. B., Hernández, V., Diez, S. B., & Velásquez, J. D. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101960 · Cited by 9
Hoffman, H., Wood, J., Cote, J. R., Jalal, M. S., Otite, F. O., Masoud, H. E., & Gould, G. (2023) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.11.060 · Cited by 8
Maroufi, S. F., Doğruel, Y., Pour‐Rashidi, A., Kohli, G. S., Tomberlin, C., Uchida, T., Asfour, M. Z., Martin, C. P., Nizzola, M., Bonis, A. D., et al. (2024) · Pituitary · doi:10.1007/s11102-023-01369-6 · Cited by 8
“[3, 4] Consistently, ML has the potential to revolutionize pituitary adenoma surgery especially by providing accurate risk stratification, real-time surgical feed-back, precise navigation, and predictive analysis of surgical outcomes.”
El-Hajj, V. G., Ghaith, A. K., Terander, A. E., Ahn, E. S., Daniels, D. J., & Bydon, M. (2024) · Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics · doi:10.3171/2024.2.peds23523 · Cited by 8
Moore, I., Magnante, C., Embry, E., Mathis, J., Mooney, S., Haj-Hassan, S., Cottingham, M., & Padala, P. R. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1438012 · Cited by 8
Ehresman, J., Lubelski, D., Pennington, Z. A., Hung, B., Ahmed, A. K., Azad, T. D., Lehner, K., Feghali, J., Buser, Z., Harrop, J. S., et al. (2021) · Journal of Neurosurgery Spine · doi:10.3171/2020.8.spine20963 · Cited by 8
Machine Learning in Pituitary Surgery
Stumpo, V., Staartjes, V. E., Regli, L., & Serra, C. (2021) · Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85292-4_33 · Cited by 8
Hoffman, H., Wood, J. S., Cote, J. R., Jalal, M. S., Masoud, H. E., & Gould, G. (2023) · Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.106989 · Cited by 8
Hani, U., sinnah, Z. A. B., Obaidullah, A. J., Alanazi, J., Alanazi, M., Alharby, T. N., Awadh, A. A. A., & Lahiq, A. A. (2023) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122486 · Cited by 8
Machine learning-based clinical prediction modeling -- A practical guide for cliniciansPreprint
Kernbach, J. M., & Staartjes, V. E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.15069 · Cited by 15
“statistics (experimental setting, hypothesis testing, group comparison, inference) to data-driven statistical learning (empirical setting, algorithmic modeling comprising ML, AI, pattern recognition).[18] Unfortunately, the two statistical cultures have developed separately over the past decades [8] leading to incongr…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialApplication of neural networks for the detection of oral cancer: A systematic review
Beristain-Colorado, M. D. P., Castro‐Gutiérrez, M. E. M., Rosas, R. T., Vargas-Treviño, M., Rodríguez, A. M., Fuentes-Mascorro, G., & Argueta‐Figueroa, L. (2023) · Dental and Medical Problems · doi:10.17219/dmp/159871 · Cited by 15
Zimmerman, A., Elahi, C., Rocha, T. A. H., Sakita, F. M., Mmbaga, B. T., Staton, C. A., & Vissoci, J. R. N. (2023) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002156 · Cited by 7
“An additional review of neurosurgical prediction models identified only one machine learning based TBI prognostic model, and it achieved an AUC of 89.0 [38].”
BackgroundInfluentialFernandes, R. T., Fernandes, F. W., Kundu, M., Ramsay, D. S. C., Salih, A. A., Namireddy, S. R., Janković, D., Kalasauskas, D., Ottenhausen, M., Kramer, A., et al. (2024) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.087 · Cited by 7
Risk-Specific Training Cohorts to Address Class Imbalance in Surgical Risk Prediction
Balch, J. A., Ruppert, M. M., Guan, Z., Buchanan, T. R., Abbott, K. L., Shickel, B., Bihorac, A., Liang, M., Upchurch, G. R., Tignanelli, C. J., et al. (2024) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4299 · Cited by 7
Neurosurgery reimagined: How AI is redefining patient care and surgical excellence
Mansour, M. A., El-Salamoni, M. A.-F., Zohney, M., Elshaer, A. M., Abdelwahab, M., Aziz, M. M., Ayoub, B. M., Mostafa, H. N., & Elsamman, A. K. (2025) · Intelligent Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.isurg.2025.06.002 · Cited by 8
Machine learning models to predict neuropsychiatric disorders in various brain tumors
Shahid, S., & Iftikhar, S. (2022) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2022.2043654 · Cited by 7
“Some studies were identified by Senders et al. 20 which applied ML to predict outcomes after neurosurgery for epilepsy, Parkinson ’ s disease, hemorrhages, hydrocephalus, etc.”
Alshammari, D. A., Obaidullah, A. J., Khasawneh, M. A., El-Sakhawy, M. A.-M., Elkholi, S. M. A., & Albaghdadi, M. F. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106828 · Cited by 7
Zhu, J., Shan, Y., Li, Y., Wu, X., & Gao, G. (2024) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.03.085 · Cited by 7
Grob, A., Rohr, J., Stumpo, V., Vieli, M., Ciobanu-Caraus, O., Ricciardi, L., Maldaner, N., Raco, A., Miscusi, M., Perna, A., et al. (2024) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-024-08395-3 · Cited by 7
“ODI oswestry disability index, BP back pain, LP leg pain, NRS numerical rating scale, LOESS locally estimated scatterplot smoothing range of patient characteristics [5], CPMs were developed assisting in the decision-making process [23].”
Predicting inferior vena cava filter complications using machine learning
Li, B., Eisenberg, N., Beaton, D., Lee, D. S., Al‐Omran, L., Wijeysundera, D. N., Hussain, M. A., Rotstein, O. D., de Mestral, C., Mamdani, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101943 · Cited by 7
Zhou, H., Zhou, Z., Song, Z., & Li, X. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2021.09.030 · Cited by 7
Noor, N. S. E. M., Ibrahim, H., Lah, M. H. C., & Abdullah, J. M. (2022) · BioMedInformatics · doi:10.3390/biomedinformatics2010007 · Cited by 7
“The great majority of research included in the review [23,28] found that identifying the most informative qEEG that characterizes the recovery outcome level is crucial to ensure early targeted prediction after TBI post-injury.”
BackgroundEpileptic Seizure Prediction Based on EEG by Auto-Machine Learning
Chen, C., Peng, F., Sun, Y., Lv, D., Zhang, N., Wang, X., & Wang, L. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR) · doi:10.1109/rcar54675.2022.9872265 · Cited by 7
Garofoli, R., Resche‐Rigon, M., Roux, C., van der Heijde, D. M. F. M., Dougados, M., & Moltó, A. (2022) · Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology · doi:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/mm2uzu · Cited by 7
Postoperative Delirium After Intracranial Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Kappen, P. R., Kappen, H. J., Dirven, C. M. F., Klimek, M., Jeekel, J., Andrinopoulou, E. R., Osse, R. J., & Vincent, A. J. P. E. (2023) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.12.132 · Cited by 7
Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Using Machine Learning Models
Noor, N. S. E. M., & Ibrahim, H. (2019) · Lecture notes in mechanical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-9539-0_2 · Cited by 9
Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Neurosurgery: More than Machinery
Tewarie, I. A., Hulsbergen, A. F. C., Gormley, W. B., Peul, W. C., & Broekman, M. L. D. (2021) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.057 · Cited by 7
Self-citationSalahuddin, T., Al-Maadeed, S. A., Petropoulos, I. N., Malik, R. A., Kamran, S., & Qidwai, U. A. (2019) · World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WorldS4) · doi:10.1109/worlds4.2019.8904015 · Cited by 7
Morgan, R. D., Youssi, B. W., Cação, R., Hernandez, C., & Nagy, L. (2024) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.075 · Cited by 6
Rivera, C. A., Bhatia, S., Uppalapati, V., Berke, C. N., Merenzon, M. A., Daggubati, L. C., Levy, A. S., Shah, A. H., Komotar, R. J., & Ivan, M. E. (2024) · Neurosurgical FOCUS · doi:10.3171/2024.8.focus24434 · Cited by 6
Kwarah, W., Vroom, F. B. D.-C., Dwomoh, D., & Bosomprah, S. (2025) · BMC Global and Public Health · doi:10.1186/s44263-025-00184-4 · Cited by 7
Li, B., Eisenberg, N., Beaton, D., Lee, D. S., Al‐Omran, L., Wijeysundera, D. N., Hussain, M. A., Rotstein, O. D., Greco, E., de Mestral, C., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02187-9 · Cited by 9
“These models were chosen based on their established ef fi cacy in predicting postoperative outcomes using structured data 38,44,45 .”
Baciu, M. V., O'Sullivan, L., Torlay, L., & Banjac, S. (2023) · Revue Neurologique · doi:10.1016/j.neurol.2023.02.067 · Cited by 6
Lu, S.-C., Knafl, M., Turin, A., Offodile, A. C., Ravi, V., & Sidey-Gibbons, C. J. (2023) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.22.00123 · Cited by 6
Sözer, A., Börcek, A. Ö., Sağıroğlu, Ş., Poshtkouh, A., Demirtas, Z., Karaaslan, M. M., Kuzucu, P., & Çeltikçi, E. (2023) · Journal of Neurosurgery Case Lessons · doi:10.3171/case22536 · Cited by 6
“Artificial intelligence (AI) technology includes deep learning and machine learning algorithms.(1,2) Like all fields, neurosurgery has become an increasing focus of research.”
BackgroundPan, Y., Fang, C., Zhu, X., & Wan, J. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231217814 · Cited by 6
Volovăț, S. R., Popa, T. O., Rusu, D. I., Ochiuz, L., Vasincu, D., Agop, M., Buzea, C. G., & Volovăț, C. C. (2024) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14182091 · Cited by 6
“However, their widespread adoption faces several challenges [17–21].”
BackgroundLi, B., Khan, H., Shaikh, F., Zamzam, A., Abdin, R., & Qadura, M. (2024) · Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s12265-024-10574-y · Cited by 6
“This algorithm was selected because it is widely used in literature and demonstrates excellent performance for predicting health outcomes [49–51].”
Predicting mortality risk following major lower extremity amputation using machine learning
Li, B., Eisenberg, N., Beaton, D., Lee, D. S., Al‐Omran, L., Wijeysundera, D. N., Hussain, M. A., Rotstein, O. D., de Mestral, C., Mamdani, M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.198 · Cited by 6
Preoperative nonmedical predictors of functional impairment after brain tumor surgery
Schiavolin, S., Mariniello, A., Broggi, M. A., DiMeco, F., Ferroli, P., & Leonardi, M. (2022) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06732-6 · Cited by 9
“Age, tumor characteristics, patient’s neurological and functional state are the most investigated predictors of clinical outcome [6, 7].”
BackgroundPrediction of Peripheral Artery Disease Prognosis Using Clinical and Inflammatory Biomarker Data
Li, B., Shaikh, F., Zamzam, A., Raphael, R., Syed, M. H., Younes, H. K., Abdin, R., & Qadura, M. (2024) · Journal of Inflammation Research · doi:10.2147/jir.s471150 · Cited by 6
“29 32 Using data from the model discovery cohort, the random forest model was trained with ten-fold cross validation to predict PAD prognosis (2-year MALE) using the following input features: 1) clinical characteristics (sex, age, dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, past/current smoking, CHF,…”
MethodIntroduction. Predictive analytics in medicine
Asher, A. L., Devin, C. J., Harbaugh, R. E., & Bydon, M. (2018) · Neurosurgical FOCUS · doi:10.3171/2018.8.focus18441 · Cited by 6
Lehner, K., Ehresman, J., Pennington, Z. A., Ahmed, A. K., Lubelski, D., & Sciubba, D. M. (2020) · Global Spine Journal · doi:10.1177/2192568220963060 · Cited by 6
“When a limited data set is used to train an algorithm with a high percentage of the data used for training, it is prone to bias and overfitting.(24) Many of the studies described here benefit from the use of a prospectively collected multicenter database, which should minimize this drawback.”
BackgroundMethodMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience: Taming the Unchained Prometheus
Staartjes, V. E., Regli, L., & Serra, C. (2021) · Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85292-4_1 · Cited by 6
Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnosis of Lower Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review
Langarizadeh, M., & Sayadi, M. (2021) · Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal · doi:10.32592/ircmj.2021.23.7.436 · Cited by 6
Angioarchitectural features of brain arteriovenous malformation presented with seizures
Yan, L., Tao, W., Zhan, Q., Huang, Z., Chen, F., & Li, S. (2022) · Neurosurgical Review · doi:10.1007/s10143-022-01814-3 · Cited by 6
“showed that ML had a higher average accuracy than LR in predicting neurosurgical outcomes [29].”
Editorial. Prognostication in traumatic brain injury: now what?
Hawryluk, G. W. J. (2024) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2023.12.jns232644 · Cited by 6
Ma, W., Chen, C., Gong, Y., Chan, N. Y., Jiang, M., Mak, C. H., Abrigo, J., & Dou, Q. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2024.3390812 · Cited by 5
“As accurate outcome prediction is highly desirable to optimize treatment decision-making for stroke, more and more machine learning-based methods have been proposed to estimate the treatment outcome in clinical practice [31].”
BackgroundPredicting outcomes following endovascular aortoiliac revascularization using machine learning
Li, B., Aljabri, B. A., Beaton, D., Al‐Omran, L., Hussain, M. A., Lee, D. S., Wijeysundera, D. N., Rotstein, O. D., de Mestral, C., Mamdani, M., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01865-y · Cited by 5
“We selected these models because of their demonstrated ef fi cacy in predicting postoperative outcomes 57 – 59 .”
Big data and artificial intelligence in post-stroke aphasia: A mapping review
Pottinger, G., & Kearns, Á. (2024) · Advances in Communication and Swallowing · doi:10.3233/acs-230005 · Cited by 7
Shalom, E., Goldstein, A., Weiss, R., Selivanova, M., Cohen, N. M., & D, Y. S. M. (2024) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104686 · Cited by 5
Li, B., Nassereldine, R., Shaikh, F., Younes, H. K., AbuHalimeh, B. J., Zamzam, A., Abdin, R., & Qadura, M. (2024) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14171847 · Cited by 6
“Random forest is commonly used in the literature and performs well with healthcare data [24–26].”
MethodMittal, A., Buddhiraju, A., Subih, M. A., Chen, T. L., Shimizu, M. R., Seo, H. H., Rezazadehsaatlou, M., Xiao, P., & Kwon, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105634 · Cited by 5
Karabacak, M., & Margetis, K. D. (2023) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2023.0122 · Cited by 5
Shahrestani, S., Shlobin, N. A., Gendreau, J. L., Brown, N. J., Himstead, A. S., Patel, N., Pierzchajlo, N., Chakravarti, S., Lee, D. J., Chiarelli, P. A., et al. (2023) · Pediatric Neurosurgery · doi:10.1159/000531754 · Cited by 5
Drexler, R., Ricklefs, F. L., Pantel, T., Göttsche, J., Nitzschke, R., Zöllner, C., Westphal, M., & Dührsen, L. (2023) · Acta Neurochirurgica · doi:10.1007/s00701-023-05672-w · Cited by 5
“Recent studies focused mainly on the postoperative outcome [4, 9, 33, 37].”
BackgroundApplications of machine learning for nursing monitoring of electroencephalography
Zabihi, M. R., Rohampour, K., Rashtiani, S., Alizadeh, T., & Akhoondian, M. J. (2023) · Journal of Nursing Reports in Clinical Practice · doi:10.32598/jnrcp.23.49 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Senders, J. T., Staples, P. C., Karhade, A. V., Zaki, M. M., Gormley, W. B., Broekman, M. L. D., Smith, T. R., & Arnaout, O.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Arnaout, Omar
- ORCID
- Venue
- World Neurosurgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 109
- Pages
- 476-486.e1
- ISSN
- 1878-8750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2761529114
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 13
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- World Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- machine learning, surgical decision-making, epilepsy surgery, brain tumor surgery, spinal lesions, neurovascular disease, movement disorders, traumatic brain injury, hydrocephalus, survival prediction, recurrence prediction, adverse events, prognostic score, clinical decision support
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Computer Simulation, Decision Support Techniques, Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Prognosis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Neurosurgical Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review