Cited by 178Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

An introduction and overview of machine learning in neurosurgical care

Open access
Senders, Joeky T., Zaki, Mark M., Karhade, Aditya V., Chang, Bliss, Gormley, William B., Broekman, Marike L., Smith, Timothy R., Arnaout, Omar·2018·Acta Neurochirurgica

Abstract

Background Machine learning (ML) is a branch of artificial intelligence that allows computers to learn from large complex datasets without being explicitly programmed. Although ML is already widely manifest in our daily lives in various forms, the considerable potential of ML has yet to find its way into mainstream medical research and day-to-day clinical care. The complex diagnostic and therapeutic modalities used in neurosurgery provide a vast amount of data that is ideally suited for ML models. This systematic review explores ML's potential to assist and improve neurosurgical care.Method A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases to identify all potentially relevant studies up to January 1, 2017. All studies were included that evaluated ML models assisting neurosurgical treatment.Results Of the 6,402 citations identified, 221 studies were selected after subsequent title/abstract and full-text screening. In these studies, ML was used to assist surgical treatment of patients with epilepsy, brain tumors, spinal lesions, neurovascular pathology, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, and hydrocephalus. Across multiple paradigms, ML was found to be a valuable tool for presurgical planning, intraoperative guidance, neurophysiological monitoring, and neurosurgical outcome prediction.Conclusions ML has started to find applications aimed at improving neurosurgical care by increasing the efficiency and precision of perioperative decision-making. A thorough validation of specific ML models is essential before implementation in clinical neurosurgical care. To bridge the gap between research and clinical care, practical and ethical issues should be considered parallel to the development of these techniques.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00701-017-3385-8

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data-induced bias refers to the bias when the training data is not representative or insufficient that affects the algorithm model.

    “Data-induced bias refers to the bias when the training data is not representative or insufficient that affects the algorithm model”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mitchell TM (1997) Machine learning. McGraw-Hill Science, New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Senders, J. T., Zaki, M. M., Karhade, A. V., Chang, B., Gormley, W. B., Broekman, M. L., Smith, T. R., & Arnaout, O.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Arnaout, Omar
Venue
Acta Neurochirurgica
Published
2017-11-13
Volume
160
Issue
1
Pages
29-38
ISSN
  • 0001-6268 (ISSN-L)
  • 0942-0940
OpenAlex
W2768899399
Cited by
178
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Acta Neurochirurgica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
machine learning, neurosurgery, epilepsy, brain tumors, spinal lesions, neurovascular pathology, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, hydrocephalus, presurgical planning, intraoperative guidance, neuromonitoring, clinical implementation, model validation, AI ethics
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Brain, Decision Making, Humans, Prognosis, Spinal Cord, Neurosurgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review