Cited by 37Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment

Disruption of frontal aslant tract is not associated with long-term postoperative language deficits

Young, Jacob S., Morshed, Ramin A., Mansoori, Ziba, Cha, Soonmee, Berger, Mitchel S.·2020·World Neurosurgery

Abstract

Background The frontal aslant tract (FAT) is a white matter fiber pathway connecting the superior frontal gyrus to the Broca area. This tract in the dominant hemisphere has been shown to play a role in speech initiation and production, and direct subcortical stimulation can induce stuttering and speech arrest in a patient. However, controversy remains as to whether disruption of this pathway will lead to a permanent language deficit and if it is even necessary to map this tract during tumor resections of the dominant frontal lobe.Case description Here, we report a case of a patient with a lower-grade diffuse glioma invading the dominant FAT that was removed with an asleep craniotomy. In the immediate postoperative state, the patient had a transcortical motor dysphasia and was unable to initiate speech. These immediate language deficits quickly recovered, and the patient was neurologically intact at the time of discharge a few days after surgery.Conclusions Given the high likelihood for a complete neurologic recovery including transient aphasia, we propose that awake mapping for the purpose of identifying the dominant FAT is unnecessary during tumor resection and that disruption of this tract is not associated with any long-term language deficits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.128

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The function of the regions of interest, with the exception of aAF, can be compensated for by other undamaged regions, for example after functional reorganization.

    “they suggest that the function of our regions of interest, with the exception of aAF, can be compensated for by other undamaged regions (e.g. after functional reorganization; Young et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, J. S., Morshed, R. A., Mansoori, Z., Cha, S., & Berger, M. S.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Berger, Mitchel S.
Venue
World Neurosurgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
133
Pages
192-195
ISSN
1878-8750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2976400890
Cited by
37
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • World Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
frontal aslant tract, language deficits, transcortical motor aphasia, speech initiation, glioma, awake craniotomy, Broca's area, superior frontal gyrus, postoperative recovery
MeSH terms
Aphasia, Craniotomy, Female, Glioma, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review