The needs and experiences of women with gestational diabetes mellitus from minority ethnic backgrounds in high-income nations: A systematic integrative review
Abstract
Background Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) represents a growing challenge worldwide, with significant risks to both the mother and baby that extend beyond the duration of the pregnancy and immediate post-partum period. Women from ethnic minority groups who access GDM care in high-income settings face particular challenges. The aim of this systematic integrative review is to explore the experiences and needs of women with GDM from select ethnic groups in high-income healthcare settings. Methods For the purposes of this systematic integrative review, a comprehensive search strategy explored the electronic databases CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for primary studies that explored the needs and experiences of women with gestational diabetes from select ethnic minority groups living in high-income nations. The ethnicity of the women in the study included: East, South and Southeast Asian, Indian subcontinent, Aboriginal/First Nations, Torres Strait Islander, Pacific Islander, Māori, Middle Eastern, African, or South/Latina American. Studies were assessed with the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool and findings were synthesised with thematic analysis. Results This review included 15 qualitative studies, one mixed method, and one cross-sectional study. Six high-income nations were represented. The voices and experiences of 843 women who originated from at least one ethnic minority group are represented. Four major themes were constructed: psychological impact of GDM, GDM care and education, GDM and sociocultural impact, and GDM and lifestyle changes. Discussion and conclusion Limitations exist in the provision of culturally appropriate care to support the management of GDM in women from select ethnic groups in high-income healthcare settings. Women require care that is culturally appropriate, considering the individual needs and cultural practices of the woman. Engaging a woman's partner and family ensures good support is provided. Culturally appropriate care needs to be co-designed with communities so that women are at the centre of their care, avoiding a one-size-fits-all approach.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Encouraging women with GDM to engage in self-management can be especially challenging due to varying healthcare knowledge, sociocultural practices, attitudes, and beliefs related to food, which differ across population groups.
“However, encouraging women with GDM to engage in self-management can be especially challenging due to varying healthcare knowledge, sociocultural practices, attitudes, and beliefs related to food, which differ across population groups [154].”
From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [154]
Cites
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312 · see citing works
A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes
Landon, M. B., Spong, C. Y., Thom, E., Carpenter, M. W., Ramin, S. M., Casey, B., Wapner, R. J., Varner, M. W., Rouse, D. J., Thorp, J. M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0902430 · Cited by 2,122 · see citing works
Product review: Covidence (systematic review software)
Babineau, J. (2014) · Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l'Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada · doi:10.5596/c14-016 · Cited by 721 · see citing works
Wicklow, B. A., Sellers, E. A. C., Sharma, A. K., Kroeker, K., Nickel, N. C., Philips-Beck, W., & Shen, G. X. (2018) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1201 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Bandyopadhyay, M. (2021) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03981-5 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cheong, L., Law, L. S.-C., Tan, L. Y. L., Amal, A. A.-A., Khoo, C. M., & Eng, P. C. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17071210 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tzotzis, L., Hooper, M.-E., Douglas, A., Kurz, E., Atchan, M., Spiller, S., & Davis, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Canberra (AU)
- American Health Care Association (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davis, Deborah
- Venue
- Women and Birth
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-216
- ISSN
- 1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4293168202
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- ACT Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, ethnic minority women, patient experience, patient needs, culturally appropriate care, psychological impact, health education, socio-cultural impacts, lifestyle modification, family and partner support, high-income countries
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Delivery of Health Care, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Infant, Minority Groups, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review